You all crack me up - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums

Brownfan80 · 02-07-2006, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Na_polian

Cowherd is basically refusing to recognize the Stealers win, so he is saying if the pats win next year, it's a threepeat - It's funny as hell, expecially the way Stealers fans are reacting to him

Ahh so it was the joke I thought it was.

Sometimes I'm slow, but not as slow as an NFL Official!

No wonder Rodney wants to become one.. He can clean their act up!

coltshater · 02-07-2006, 02:30 PM

While supplies last!

http://cgi.ebay.com/SEAHAWKS-SUPERBO...QQcmdZViewItem

Brownfan80 · 02-07-2006, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltshater

Get them while they're hot!

http://cgi.ebay.com/Seahawks-got-Rob...QQcmdZViewItem

That's pretty good, but I'm waiting for the 2006 NFL Champion Striped Zebras Tshirt.

Brownfan80 · 02-07-2006, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coltshater

While supplies last!

http://cgi.ebay.com/SEAHAWKS-SUPERBO...QQcmdZViewItem

I actually like this one much better. I might just make myself one on my tshirt screen printer!

***IcyPatriot*** · 02-07-2006, 02:33 PM

Closing Time has been awaiting this orgasm of delirium for 5 years. Okay, you won...now go clean your basement appartment before disease sets in.

The Gr8est · 02-07-2006, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClosingTime

NFL CHAMPION PITTSBURGH STEELERS

For those of you who are unaware, THIS year THAT is the NFL's version of the heavyweight boxing champion of the world.

sarge · 02-07-2006, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brownfan80

Actually, you are the one that's wrong about the pylon rule. After the SB there was a link posted to a list of 2005/2006 rule changes and this was one of them. Jackson's play illustrated EXACTLY what the new rule states is "in bounds". The rule reads that if one foot is in bounds, and the other foot hits the pylon then that is in bounds no matter where the second foot lands. Jackson's catch was a TD by the new rule, without question. Just because the refs apparently don't even know the rules and are ignorant does not mean that they are correct. And that surely doesn't mean that you're correct based on their bad calls. They also watched a blatant horse collar tackle by joey porter on alexander and didn't call the penalty though that is another new rule change for this past season. apparently they didn't implement any new rule penalties when it would benefit the seahawks for the plays to be called correctly, but they unearth the low block nonsense on a legit tackle when it gets Pitt a few extra yards. Get a clue.

Do you have a link to that rule change.

I find that one a little hard to believe!

coltshater · 02-07-2006, 02:40 PM

This might be my favorite!

http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Corruption-o...QQcmdZViewItem

WelcometothaRazor · 02-07-2006, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bella*chick

Okay here's some more....

NFL SHAM-PION PITTSBURGH STEALERS
NFL SHAM-PION PITTSBURGH STEALERS
NFL SHAM-PION PITTSBURGH STEALERS

Go on. With repetition comes numbing acceptance.

THE STEALERS!! so simple, yet so perfect!!!

dryheat44 · 02-07-2006, 02:51 PM

I actually think the horse-collar was a good non-call. The rule is that you can't grab the player's shoulder pads and yank him down backwards. The Porter play, and most plays this year that have most people yelling "Horsecollar!", was an example of a defender grabbing the player by the collar/shoulder pads and dragging him forward to the ground.

It's amazing how many scribes and broadcasters can't understand the rule.

That is the ONLY questionable call I agree with, though.