ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Once again, ill-informed. The bet was $50, correct? Paid in full.
Again, very low.
And I didn't say Culpepper was a better quarterback, but rather statistically the two were quite comparable.
Except for wins. Wasn't Culpepper's best season 8-8?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CREDIT - Sicilian
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Except for wins. Wasn't Culpepper's best season 8-8?
Next time two quarterbacks play a one on one game of football, let me know. I know Brady is 1,000,000 times the quarterback Culpepper is/was; but using team wins to justify individual greatness is nothing short of moronic.
Next time two quarterbacks play a one on one game of football, let me know. I know Brady is 1,000,000 times the quarterback Culpepper is/was; but using team wins to justify individual greatness is nothing short of moronic.
Except for the fact that, you know, the quarterback position IS THE MOST IMPORTANT POSITION IN FOOTBALL. Maybe in sports. Or would you care to explain how the Pats went from an 18-1 team with Brady in there to a 6-4 team with Brady out? The quarterback is instrumental in moving the football. Moving the football = picking up yards. Picking up yards = getting into the red zone. Getting into the red zone = points either way. Points = difference between a win and a loss.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Except for the fact that, you know, the quarterback position IS THE MOST IMPORTANT POSITION IN FOOTBALL. Maybe in sports. Or would you care to explain how the Pats went from an 18-1 team with Brady in there to a 6-4 team with Brady out? The quarterback is instrumental in moving the football. Moving the football = picking up yards. Picking up yards = getting into the red zone. Getting into the red zone = points either way. Points = difference between a win and a loss.
Then why is the guy that is best at moving the football and accumulating touchdowns all time without a Super Bowl ring?
I'll tell you why.
It's a team game and that guy never had a running back worth a damn and his defense allowed more than 30 points per game in his 11 career post-season losses.
that guy never had a running back worth a damn and his defense allowed more than 30 points per game in his 11 career post-season losses.
Care for some cheese with that whine, Water Boy?
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
And here's one Wicked Pissah big GFY to you, Water Boy!
Glad to see you gettin' outa Mom's basement!
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH
Glad to see you've got a sweet ass pony tail. Haha, should've figured that's what you were like.
Aqwaaah, I am aware that your troglodytic mind cannot process basic logic. Therefore, I am fairly empathetic towards you going after PWP. However, you would be best served to realize you are speaking to a very bright guy. He was a DEC guy. I am sure you have no idea what DEC was, but for all intents and purposes; imagine google in the 80's dealing with hardware, not software. You don't get in the door unless you are off the charts bright.
Dude, I gave you crap before because you are a clown. I felt bad about it at the time because I always believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt. Thanks for removing the guilt, chief. You sure are a grade a retard.