- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 8,096
- Reaction score
- 15,453
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
We repeated in 03/04, and Yea I heard that before because of our D but that wasn't a bad team, same season Gronk broke a record with like 17TDs and we had Hernandez and Welker
This. The 2011 team was relatively average for the early 2010s era Patriots. Plus, had we won, it would have been written off as coming against a 9-7 team, and wouldn't have changed anything about 18-1.
SmhI want 52
and 46
and 42
and 41
and don't feel that I should have to settle for anything less.
Maybe if we win 46, Hernandez gets a ring, and is wearing it the night of the homicide, looks at it, and thinks twice about his actions and goes home instead. Hmmm
Nice to think about but I doubt it plus he had already shot someone else prior to the lloyd murdrm iircMaybe if we win 46, Hernandez gets a ring, and is wearing it the night of the homicide, looks at it, and thinks twice about his actions and goes home instead. Hmmm
Super Bowl 52 so we can be the only team to repeat twice. I’m not even sure the 2011 team deserved to be there tbh.
Super Bowl 52 easily, I live in PA and wouldn't have to deal with my stupid coworkers anymore.
lol im just messing with you but the forum join date argument is hilaaaaariousSorry I mean repeat TWICE. Besides I’ve been on this forum a lot longer than you.
The Steelers repeated twice.
Oh right I forgot about those. Man, Hernandez would've been great for a Netflix documentary. I bet Netflix could've convinced everyone he was innocent too lolNice to think about but I doubt it plus he had already shot someone else prior to the lloyd murdrm iirc
This is a good perspective to have. I am not mad at all about 52 because I genuinely felt like the better team won. Their fans may be pricks about it (and I'd probably be too if my team had lost 10+ years ago to the same opponent in the SB) but for the most part it doesn't bother me a bit. Backup QB, backup LT, backup whatevers and still ran through the playoffs offensively. Hat tip to that one. But 2011 to that ****ing dope especially when Welker drops a ball he made in his sleep up to that point? The safety? The fact we had two WRs playing defense in the AFCCG? Ugh. Brutal. Not to mention it was in Indy, too. Would've been a total Colts fan d**k punch. Yea, gimme 46.46 because we were truly, absolutely the better team for the second time against a team that got every break and bounce imaginable - the 2011 Giants were OUTSCORED during the regular season while we went in the game with the best weapon in the NFL playing on one leg, AND had at least three fairly easy chances to put the game away (strip sack we didn’t recover, Brady’s crazy INT attempt to Gronk, the Welker drop).
In 52, were we really the better team with that defense? We got to face a team who lost their MVP level candidate and they were still at least equal overall, if not better. If we play that game 100 times they win at least 50 with Foles, and obviously more with Wentz.
I think the most important reason in favor of SB52 is that NE would have been the only team with two different dynasties (2001-2007 and 2014-2017).