varjao
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 6,558
- Reaction score
- 6,240
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The refs are gutless this year. Always calling plays the way that it will be automatically reviewed so they don't make the wrong decision. There is no way that should have been called a fumble, but they know if they don't call it a fumble and the booth doesn't catch it they will be publicly criticized and possibly demoted.
Oakland DESERVED to lose to the hated Squealers. They rushed half the defense and failed to double plus cover a guy who had tooled them time and again all game. Thats on the defensive coordinator. I'm wicked pissed Oakland lost.
Correct, the Steelers did their job, but I recall a few blatant home calls like in that fumble when the Raiders was going to get the lead again in the end of the 3rd quarter, it was a helmet to helmet violent hit, how didn't they call a foul on that play is inexcusable, the ref was just in front of the play.
And Lysol spray for deoderant.I think I'm going to wash with bleach and Simple Green for soap ...
I assume that too but they always begin the opening description with " both teams will have the opportunity to possess the ball." In that case, only team gets it".....
Well that language is key for me. "Both teams have the opportunity" not the certainty or right. Both teams have the opportunity to possess the ball but if the first team scores a TD the only team never gets to possess it. It does not mean you did not have an opportunity. You simply failed to take advantage of it.
Likewise if one team scores a walk off FG it is not like you did not have a realistic opportunity you simply squandered it.
Old rules was lame. Teams just stop trying to score and kicking field goals once they got to the 20 was stupid. Especially for a high scoring game where neither team played defense. Losing on a touchdown is much easier to swallow.That is no different than the old OT rules. In both cases the team that gets it first and scores a TD wins without the other team getting the ball.
IMO if the team that wins the toss runs the kickoff back to the opponents 5 yard line and kicks a FG, they deserve the win.
The rule change should be called the Crybaby Rule.
Old rules was lame. Teams just stop trying to score and kicking field goals once they got to the 20 was stupid. Especially for a high scoring game where neither team played defense. Losing on a touchdown is much easier to swallow.
Watching the sunday night yesterday, I think Chip Kelly is back to college next year, the experiment is over, he was looking scared ****less and lost in the sidelines, like thinking about all the moves he made and that team is still a huge crap.
Moving from Foles to Bustford never made sense and still doesn't, an injury prone crossed eyes dumb QB for Foles who was still growing and on a cheap contract.
Peyton's a good guy. I know we're all Pats fans, Brady fans, but in a league with guys like Hardy, Pacman Jones, Ray Rice etc, Peyton stands tall in character.
Wtf are you talking about? He sexually assaulted his trainer in college. And because mommy and daddy are connected he got away with it. His public persona doesn't represent the horrible human being he really is.
Wtf are you talking about? He sexually assaulted his trainer in college. And because mommy and daddy are connected he got away with it. His public persona doesn't represent the horrible human being he really is.