jboston19
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,072
- Reaction score
- 3,586
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How do we know this without knowing who the Pats will sign as a potential offset in the comp formula?
No, it makes that specific postion perhaps weaker and we dont know what Bennett will bring. As far as the team being weaker, how can you definitively state that? You have no idea.People act like losing Flowers is perfectly fine. It's not. It makes this a weaker team.
No, it makes that specific postion perhaps weaker and we dont know what Bennett will bring. As far as the team being weaker, how can you definitively state that? You have no idea.
We have seen this type of thing over and over and the team always seems to be fine. I will never understand how not paying a huge contract to a player makes the team worse. The whole team was not Trey Flowers.
Maybe BB knows he can use that money to get a player in another position who will bring much more than his value. He has a little bit of a track record at it so pardon me if I dont take some posters word on the "team" being "weaker" because one player left.
As I said, ahem, the methodology works. But it doesn't necessarily pay immediate dividends.
Paying Darelle Revis also works, and it pays immediate dividends.
People act like losing Flowers is perfectly fine. It's not. It makes this a weaker team.
Well--we went from 2004 to 2014 without winning Super Bowls using this methodology.
Here's what Bill is all about -- at least today:Nothing that happened today feels good. But that's not what Bill is about.
Here's what Bill is all about -- at least today:
It's his commentary on the first days of free agency.Someone should remind him "No Days Off!!!
.
I kinda like the 17 mill of cap space that comes with the 3rd rounder.I'd rather have Trey Flowers than a 3rd round pick to be honest.
In one area, but stronger in others.As I said, ahem, the methodology works. But it doesn't necessarily pay immediate dividends.
Paying Darelle Revis also works, and it pays immediate dividends.
People act like losing Flowers is perfectly fine. It's not. It makes this a weaker team.
You aren’t really questioning the plan of a team that has won 6 of the last 18 SBs and gone to 9 of them because of the ones we didn’t win, are you?Well--we went from 2004 to 2014 without winning Super Bowls using this methodology. Then we drafted guys like Trey Flowers, and we won 3 Super Bowls... so, yes, the method works, but not all the time. Sometimes you need Trey Flowers.
2005-2013, 9 seasons (8 with Brady): the Pats were in 5 AFC championship games and 2 SB appearances. Yeah, they sucked.
You aren’t really questioning the plan of a team that has won 6 of the last 18 SBs and gone to 9 of them because of the ones we didn’t win, are you?
BTW Flowers was a in college in 2014.
I did that’s why I asked the question.Did you read my post?
So your point was that they were just not good enough for you. Or they could have been better if they did not let big ticket free agents walk.Yes, that was my point. They sucked. The Patriots were dreadful. I said that.
It's interesting that anyone we sign now would cost us a 3rd unless things change.
I'm hoping some of the other guys like Malcom Brown or Shelton or Dorsett or Hogan would sign with other teams at a level that factors into the Comp formula. That would give us some flexibility in signing some guys back. It's easier to negate an expected 6th round pick with a signing than a 3rd.