- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
I completely disagree.
That's fine. This is America. You're allowed to be completely wrong.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I completely disagree.
Not sure even Kony Ealy's mom would describe his NFL career to this point as 'very good.'
I completely disagree. Of course they are pointless. The truth is that no one has any idea who had the best draft right now. That's because development and coaching are much more important than simply picking a good college player. It's about what happens after the draft.
Of course you can come to a conclusion quicker on some players than others. But the general point is that it takes time to evaluate.
4th round (#137) - solid, experienced #2 move-TE
Now is a good time to unfurl the obligatory Borges:
" "On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson or the second-best tackle in the draft in Kenyatta Walker, they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sack last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end. This genius move was followed by trading out of a spot where they could have gotten the last decent receiver in Robert Ferguson and settled for tackle Matt Light, who will not help any time soon."
/
In all fairness to SI, they had a supplemental grade of A- if you include the off season trades of 1st and 2nd round picks.Gotta wonder what "grade" the mediots would give to THIS use of draft picks...
1st round (#32) - experienced, elite WR
2nd round (#64) - very good, experienced rotational DE
3rd round (#83) - DE/OLB, potential rookie contributor - DEREK RIVERS
3rd round (#85) - OT, potential 2nd-year starter - ANTONIO GARCIA
4th round (#137) - solid, experienced #2 move-TE
4th round (#131) - DE/3-TECH potential rotational/backup - DEATRICH WISE
5th round (#163) - solid, experienced RB
5th round (#183) - experienced #3 TE/proven special-teamer
6th round (during 2016) - Van Noy, experienced starting LB
6th round (during 2016) - experienced #3 TE, Michael Williams
7th round (#211) - potential backup OT - CONNOR McDERMOTT
Grading a team's "draft" exclusively based on which (still) untested college prospects they selected is totally effing meaningless. Yet another in a long list of reasons to ignore media opinions.
Plus, remember how the media, including the SB announcers, kept talking about how young the Atlanta team was? The reality is that the Pats were younger (average age being the metric). But nobody notices that.
Most writers would get a pass. But it's Borges. Every time I see a photo of him I think "keep the children close by."
Yeah but it'll be at least 3 years before any of those guys contribute.
Move tight end? Dwayne Allen is an in-line blocking tight end. If they're both on the field, Gronk is more likely to be the move tight end because he's way more athletic.
He was the Lacrosse coach at Brandeis when I was a student there. My friends who were on the team can actually vouch for your statement.
.
SI Gives Pats a C+ FYI the NY Jets got a C-
2017 NFL draft grades: Final reports on every team
Chad Reuter gives Pats a B+ and the NYJ a B...
2017 NFL Draft: Quick-snap grades for all 32 teams
Pete Prisco gives the Pats a B and the Jets a C+
Prisco's NFL Draft Grades for all 32 teams: Five earn 'A's, two fall short with 'D's
Wow. I was kidding.
IMO complete nonsense. Nobody can accurately and precisely evaluate this. Huge complicating factors are individual team needs, the ability of individual players to "make it" at the NFL level, and the ability for a team to "coach up" the rookies leading up to the season and beyond. Does anybody really care what these dweebs' opinions are? Just more click bait to ignore.