cmasspatsfan
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 8,729
- Reaction score
- 8,476
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How do you think they would have done in 2008 if TB didnt tear his ACL? He was at his peak and is was mostly the same team as 2007. That might have been another super bowl.
What are you talking about? The Deflategate scam was hatched IN the AFCCG and nobody on NE knew about it until after the AFCCG was over.
I wholheartedly agree the elite defenses were 01 thru 04....it should be noted that Brady and the offense played a role in the defense imo. If you remember back then Brady was a game manager and a possession manager. Combined with short passes and screens and a solid run game they would possess the ball for massive chunks of the game. I remember the ToP being highlighted weekly, often skewed as heavily as 2 to 1 for Patriots. The defense got alot of rest in those 21 to 14 and 17 to 10 wins...
It's one long run
@QuantumMechanic
@robertweathers
In my opinion it actually makes it less it a bit to try to "break" it into smaller chunks..
It is one long continuous run of insane organizational success under the same HC and QB. Saying it is a 18 year run of Ultra Success verses 3 or 4 shorter runs combined makes no sense and actually makes it seem smaller than what it really is.
I think history will view the whole thing as the Brady/Belichick Era, 2000-20XX.
Keep it simple and base it on a current standard which is the QB and coach.
2000-2018 BB was hired. Tom was drafted.
50 Browns, 70s Steelers, 60s Packers, 90s Cowboys, 70s LOLfins all had just one QB and coach during the stretch.
as if that was a mistake and not the result of Belichick's genius at work.
I mostly agree, though I think Seattle could have called a pass play that had both less risk and played to their strengths. Roll Wilson out right. That would have put tremendous stress on the defense because he’s a threat to run it in and if they come up on him he could throw it over them to the endzone. If nothing comes open as he approaches the sideline just airmail it through the endzone. By the play’s design he’d be out of the tackle box so no risk of IG.Belichick has said that throwing the ball there was the right call but most idiot fans and commentators only judge a play by it's results - which if you carried that logic out to it's full conclusion means they would anoint an idiot OC as a genius if he's just slightly less of an idiot than his DC opponents...
You throw and it's a touchdown you're a genius.
You throw and it's incomplete you still have 2 more downs to try to punch it in.
Turning over the ball wasn't the design of the play, it was a great read by Malcolm Butler. A great read on a play by a defensive player doesn't mean the call was a bad call and I can't stand this type of results-oriented evaluation of decisions.
Belichick has said that throwing the ball there was the right call but most idiot fans and commentators only judge a play by it's results -
What a great article.
Belichick has said that throwing the ball there was the right call but most idiot fans and commentators only judge a play by it's results - which if you carried that logic out to it's full conclusion means they would anoint an idiot OC as a genius if he's just slightly less of an idiot than his DC opponents...
You throw and it's a touchdown you're a genius.
You throw and it's incomplete you still have 2 more downs to try to punch it in.
Turning over the ball wasn't the design of the play, it was a great read by Malcolm Butler. A great read on a play by a defensive player doesn't mean the call was a bad call and I can't stand this type of results-oriented evaluation of decisions.
I mostly agree, though I think Seattle could have called a pass play that had both less risk and played to their strengths. Roll Wilson out right. That would have put tremendous stress on the defense because he’s a threat to run it in and if they come up on him he could throw it over them to the endzone. If nothing comes open as he approaches the sideline just airmail it through the endzone. By the play’s design he’d be out of the tackle box so no risk of IG.
| 19 | 1K |
| 13 | 469 |
| 10 | 629 |
| 6 | 486 |
| 7 | 772 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











