He thinks it is. Their play calling was night and day in the first and second halves in Green Bay. First half, they did what ended up getting them to the dance. Then I heard Arians say, “we need to be aggressive” at halftime, and rolled my eyes. Sure enough... bombs away. Lots of plays with 3-4 vertical routes that Green Bay’s defense was obviously all over. The bad thing is, the Fappers were GIVING them the underneath routes. Arians and Leftwich just didn’t want to take it, and they ended up letting Rodgers and Co back into the game. Of course, Brady also should not have thrown those two balls off his back foot under duress. Stupid ass decisions. But hard to hate on two of them. One was in plus territory where he was hoping Evans would high point the ball and the other was also in plus territory and was basically a punt.
"We need to be agressive"...lmao...and the best part is how the gameplan didn't change when the Packers gave them 7 more points to start the second half. All that power running in the first half in the name of "ball control" and then fire a bunch of downfield bombs into double coverage up 28-10. How is this team in the Super Bowl??
I'm not sure if you watched
All or Nothing on Amazon Prime, but it's a much better version of
Hard Knocks and featured the 2015 Arizona Cardinals, so there was quite a bit of Arians, and you know he's going to act exactly the same on camera as he would behind closed doors.
It's startling how little he seems to understand about strategy in light of winning/losing. There are a few times when the team makes idiotic decisions, and yet he basically thinks they were "good bad decisions" because they worked that one time or because the team won the game. It's similar to earlier this season when Ronald Jones started, Leonard Fournette came in and was so much better, and Arians claimed it was evidence that starting Jones - and giving him the bulk of the reps - was correct because Fournette ran down the defense in the fourth quarter. No self-awareness or critical thinking that, should you put the weaker running back in for the first three quarters, you're less likely to have a fourth quarter lead.
Which is why I fear he looked at the gameplan against the Saints, which was really not a good one but made some sense in protecting the ball and limiting risk due to the previous disaster, and reasoned that it was the right move because they won and then recycled it for the Packers game, which they won. It's like he thinks his bad gameplan was the reason the defense forced two major fumbles and the offense has scored almost all their touchdowns getting the ball in opponent territory. The offense over the last two games has three turnovers and has been borderline abysmal considering their talent and especially considering the job the offensive line has done.
He should be looking at it like this: they're not going to win against the Chiefs if Brady averages 6 yards per attempt and completes about 55% of his passes, with a running game that averages 1.9 yards on first down. But he probably won't. He's probably giddy about taking the same approach and ramming into the Chiefs defensive line when the Chiefs secondary and the Bucs healthy receivers should be setting this up for a track meet.