A guy I've been hearing and reading a lot about is Michigan State defensive end William Gholston. The measurables are the first things that stand out at you-he's large. His measurements read 6'7", 275 pounds, and reportedly a 7'3" wingspan!
His stats don't leap out at you:
cfbstats.com - William Gholston 2011 Player Statistics - Michigan State Spartans
And he only possesses highlight tape as of now:
William Gholston - Highlight Video - YouTube
So the amount of information available is miniscule. Based on what I've seen, he's living off of his okay athleticism and his incredible size. His technique doesn't look that great, and he doesn't possess suddeness, which isn't a surprise as most guys his size have to wind up first.
He's going to have to put some work into his game because his size won't deliver the goods consistently. He also seems to be a little left of center as far as personalities go:
Michigan State's William Gholston Post Game vs Georgia - YouTube
And he also plays rough:
William Gholston Punch - YouTube
In my opinion, he's not a Patriots' player. His potential won't ever match his personality, and his skill and technique will only show up on highlight tapes, not on a down to down basis.
So in the end:
FAIL
Personally, I'm hoping that DE won't be a priority for us in 2013. And I also think it's too early to be doing pass/fail evaluations on any player. But for now, I'll play, and I'll play devil's advocate about Gholston:
1. Gholston's measurables are right in the current BB bailiwick for DE's. 6'7", great wingspan, 280# or so. Perfect.
2. Gholston has great movement skills for his size, and can play in space. He came to Michigan St. as a LB. Perfect.
3. Gholston "plays rough": well, we don't want pansies out there. We've had enough "soft" players who got pushed around by the other team. And before the infamous "punch" Taylor Lewan grabbed Gholston's helmet and facemask while he was on the ground, putting him in a position to get injured:
William Gholston has his head pinned to the ground by U-M's Taylor Lewan no penalty 2011 - YouTube
Sh*t happens. It's not ballet out there. Richard Seymour punched Ben Rothlisberger in the face, albeit when he was playing for the Raiders. Thank God the Pats dumped him first - we don't want "rough" guys like that on the team. Ndamukong Suh threw a punch at Logan Mankins last year, and called Mankins a "dirty bastard". So what? Both are tough, physical, nasty guys who I'd take on my team any day.
4. Gholston's "stats don't leap out at you". Neither did Chandler Jones' stats. Since when has BB ever give a damn about that?
5. Gholston "doesn't posess suddenness". Again, neither Jones nor Bequette is a quick-twitch marvel. BB values much more than how quick a prospect's first step is. Gholston has the length to clog the passing lanes, the size and strength to set the edge, and the power to bulldoze his way through offensive tackles.
6. Gholston's "technique doesn't look great". He was a sophomore, for Crissakes, and the film is limited. I'll leave it to BB and company to evaluate his junior film more thorough and figure out whether he can be coached up. JPP's technique sucked coming out of college.
7. Gholston "seems to the left of center as far as personalities go". Why? Because he's wearing a sombrero? Because he's a little giddy after a bowl game? He seems reasonably articulate, certainly compared to the likes of Courtney Upshaw and Quinton Coples. Here's an interview with Gholston after the infamous Michigan game:
Michigan State's William Gholston Post Game vs Michigan - YouTube
He doesn't seem too far out there to me. And if he is a little goofy, so what? Matt Light left dead animals in people's lockers and electrically shocked BB with a fake mouse, and he worked out OK. (Of course, OTG would point out that you want your left tackle to be "left of center".)
My biggest questions with Gholston are not his personality or his "playing rough" but whether he is consistent enough, whether his motor is on enough, whether he cares enough about football to work hard enough, and whether his processing speed is adequate. All of those are open questions going into his junior year. I'd be hesitant to grade him as a "fail" this early.
INCOMPLETE