manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 30,077
- Reaction score
- 25,532
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.A further thing on this drafting/evaluating WR's thing. The fail rate on non first round WR's is huge. Bearing in mind the small sample size, it might just be that the Patriots have been unlucky.
Ok, I'll bite because I DO want Fleener in the early 2nd round. The fact that Fleener is something is a cross between Gronk and Ahern is a very good thing, he can potentially perform in either role which would probably have given us a Lombardi a few weeks ago. Running a 2 TE sets with only 2 TEs on your roster is BEGGING for a disaster, it means you have 0 room in case of an injury, that's not being paranoid about an injury because that injury WILL happen, it's a statistical certainty.
Also, what free agent TEs are available that will improve the offense? The best one I can see is Visanthe Shancoe, who doesn't blow my skirt up at all, he's competant but doesn't do anything at a very high level. HE would be an example of someone it wouldnt be foolish to blow a lot of draft/cap resources on.
Also, Fleener can be split wide, I keep on hearing about how we need an outside/deep threat, there's no reason Fleener can't perform there as well, that's why it's incorrect to assume he'd be stuck behind our 2 TEs.
I wasn't thrilled about bringing in Ocho because I didnt think he had what we needed, which was the skills to be a man-beater, I actually thought Burress had those physical skills but I don't like Burress because of his head. There's no reason Fleener can't function at a higher level than Burress in that role, and he can be a fixture on the offense for the next decade, something our short term potential fixes like Lloyd and Wayne won't be.
If they waste a high pick drafting a TE, that'll be a sign that BB needs to retire.
Wow, thanks so much for your input, that post really added a lot of value. Feel free to just throw out more opinions without actually trying to provide information to back them up.
So, basically you are punishing Hill because his QB at GT was a runner more than a passer.. OK. What about all the intangibles the kid brings?
Excellent downfield blocker.
Excellent hands.
Good football smarts.
Willingness to learn. (He sought out an excellent route runner to help himself improve)..
You'd prefer to go the "safer" route and trade a 1st rounder for Mike Wallace who still can't run routes very well and whose best asset is his field awareness to bail out his QB.
You keep saying that the Pats have "failed with these types of players", but you ignore the differences in their character.
Bethel Johnson was a track guy playing football. Was injured too much.
Chad Jackson thought he could just get by on his god given talent.
Brandon Tate is someone who was drafted as a KR/PR with hopes to become a good WR.
PK Sam - See Chad Jackson.
Taylor Price - We don't really know what his issue was. It is telling that BB said they wanted to bring him back if he cleared waivers..
You don't go chasing backups, other than the sort of "easing into starter after the other guy leaves", with high draft picks.
The other thing od course is that it's not like Georgia Tech receivers have come to the NFL and failed. Calvin Johnson and Demaryius Thomas suggests there's something good about the WR coaching at GT which is backed up by Hill's performance in the combine.
Fleener would not be a backup, please feel free to read the other posts about him.
I don't think I'm punishing him, he just hasn't done or shown enough during his college career for me to be comfortable thinking he can transfer to a complex Patriots offence. Is it unlucky for him that he played in that system and never learnt the required skills? Sure. Does that mean you overlook those things? No. This isn't a late round pick where you can take a chance on a guy, we are talking about a 1st round pick for this kid.
I have no doubt he is a good kid and a hard worker. I have nothing against him, in fact I actually like him. But he has so much more work to do to be a success than most of the other top WRs in the draft. And with Brady's lack of patience in developing WR's, I don't know if he could develop here. I think the only way a rookie WR can be successful in New England is if they are good enough to contribute right away and gain Brady's trust. I don't think we can develop them and I don't think Hill can do that.
I didn't think Hill was worthy of a 1st round pick before the combine. And I don't think that running fast and jumping high without pads on should make him a 1st round pick. None of those things translate to being able to be successful in the NFL. I think its silly that these types of things have so much impact on a guys draft stock when it doesn't have any effect on their ability to play football. Its not like he magically got fast over night, he is still the same WR that played at Georgia Tech. To me he is still a mid to late 2nd round WR.
He'd be a backup TE in New England, and I've read every post in the thread.
He could be part of TE-by-committee approach. BB already does this with his RBs. That will allow Gronk and AH to get some rest, and not have any significant drop in production.
Fleener could also be lined-up all over the field. As a WR against 6' CBs.
Or part of 2 TE and AH lined up as a WR.
Or empty backfield, and then a surprise AH run. The possibilities are endless. Just have to use a little imagination. "Just a back-up" LOL
The other thing od course is that it's not like Georgia Tech receivers have come to the NFL and failed. Calvin Johnson and Demaryius Thomas suggests there's something good about the WR coaching at GT which is backed up by Hill's performance in the combine.
So, basically you are punishing Hill because his QB at GT was a runner more than a passer.. OK. What about all the intangibles the kid brings?
Excellent downfield blocker.
Excellent hands.
Good football smarts.
Willingness to learn. (He sought out an excellent route runner to help himself improve)..
To be fair, Calvin Johnson is a once in a generation WR who would be a beast no matter what school he went to and what system he played. In terms of Demaryius Thomas, I think people are overrating him based on the Pittsburgh playoff game. He only has 54 career catches and 834 yards over 2 seasons, so its not like he is consistent, quality NFL receiver yet. I'm not trying to hate on Hill, but with the complexity of the Pats offensive scheme, I think it would be best to go for WR's that have a history of production in schemes that translate better.
But that is irrelevant. GT didn't run the high school offense they do now.
How do you know?
Do I know personally? No. But then, neither does anyone else here. Nor does anyone know enough to contradict it. As I stated in a previous post, that is what is reported about the kid. If you have other information, please share..
Stephen Hill continues to impress - he's now put up the third best broad jump at the combine since 2006 behind Julio Jones and Jerome Simpson.