PatriotSeven
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 2,906
- Reaction score
- 182
Yeah, it's statements like that that once again prove you have no clue what you are talking about. Sample size ALWAYS matters when you are trying to establish what you are saying.
You are in line with Terrell Suggs, and you believe the Patriots SB36 victory was rigged. Keep it up bro and you'll be the laughingstock of the forum.
No it doesn't. Statements like yours is what tells me what I'm discussing is too far over your head.
And the only thing you have to come back with is that I'm a laughing stock. From where I stand, it doesn't look like that.
It's as stupid as saying you need a large sampling size to figure out if you hit the Powerball your chances of hitting it were 1 in 175,223,510.
You can look at a sampling size of 10000 years, and the chances of that happening won't change that it's a 0.000x% occurrence. I don't need to actually wait for that to happen to figure it out.
The fact that it's such a small time period, less than 30 years, and it popped up is actually what makes it even more unlikely.
You need a large data set if you're searching for the Higgs Boson and need a high confidence level to get there. But if the freaking thing came out and said "hi I'm a Higgs Boson" in the first 10 minutes you started your test, you may want to ask some questions or consider yourself incredibly lucky. Or maybe, someone's pulling a prank on you.