Steelers - Easiest schedule in football hands down

[BradyToMoss]

Most overrated 9-3 record in the history of this league:

Pitt has had the easiest schedule in football: Check this out

Sunday, Sept. 9 @ Browns W 34-7 (1-0)
Sunday, Sept 16 vs. Bills W 26-3 (2-0)
Sunday, Sept. 23 vs. 49ers W 37-16 (3-0)
Sunday, Sept. 30 @ Cardinals L 21-14 (3-1)
Sunday, Oct. 7 vs. Seahawks W 21-0 (4-1)
Sunday, Oct. 14 Bye Week
Sunday, Oct. 21 @ Broncos L 31-28 (4-2)
Sunday, Oct. 28 @ Bengals W 24-13 (5-2)
Monday, Nov. 5 vs. Ravens W 38-7 (6-2)
Sunday, Nov. 11 vs. Browns W 31-28 (7-2)
Sunday, Nov. 18* @ Jets L 19-16 (7-3)
Monday, Nov. 26 vs. Dolphins W 3-0 (8-3)
Sunday, Dec. 2* vs. Bengals W 24-10 (9-3)

Has there been a weaker schedule in the history of this league, I don't think so.

Come on Black and gold fans, try and defend this schedule, how could you even lose 3 games on this list, they're all Pop Warner teams.

 

[Patsguy05]

anyone want a piece of CAKE??

 

[sieglo]

That is a pretty weak-t1t schedule.

 

[wistahpatsfan]

It all changes for the frauds this Sunday. Decent football team...meet awesome football team.

 

[Double G]

What an effin joke that schedule is, Taunton High School had a tougher schedule this year.

What's even more pathetic is that they actually lost three of those games, and almost/SHOULD HAVE lost to the Doofins.

P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C...........................

 

[He Ban Me]

Most overrated 9-3 record in the history of this league:

Pitt has had the easiest schedule in football: Check this out

Sunday, Sept. 9 @ Browns W 34-7 (1-0) Playoff team as of today
Sunday, Sept 16 vs. Bills W 26-3 (2-0) In the hunt at 6-6
Sunday, Sept. 23 vs. 49ers W 37-16 (3-0) somebody has to play them
Sunday, Sept. 30 @ Cardinals L 21-14 (3-1) At 6-6, still in the hunt in the NFC
Sunday, Oct. 7 vs. Seahawks W 21-0 (4-1) Top ten in some power rankings
Sunday, Oct. 14 Bye Week
Sunday, Oct. 21 @ Broncos L 31-28 (4-2) Hard to figure out. Jekyll and Hyde. It was at home on a SUN/MON nite
Sunday, Oct. 28 @ Bengals W 24-13 (5-2) Carson and the WR corps are still good, and capable each week regardless of record
Monday, Nov. 5 vs. Ravens W 38-7 (6-2)A team you should have lost to
Sunday, Nov. 11 vs. Browns W 31-28 (7-2) A team that gave NE a pretty decent game
Sunday, Nov. 18* @ Jets L 19-16 (7-3) No excuse
Monday, Nov. 26 vs. Dolphins W 3-0 (8-3) The playing field was leveled by the playing field
Sunday, Dec. 2* vs. Bengals W 24-10 (9-3) See Above

Has there been a weaker schedule in the history of this league, I don't think so.

Come on Black and gold fans, try and defend this schedule, how could you even lose 3 games on this list, they're all Pop Warner teams.

DUDE. EIGHT of these GAMES are on the PATS schedule as well. The teams NOT on Pats schedule are:

NINERS (BAD)
CARDINALS (6-6) In the hunt
SEATTLE (8-4) Will win their Division and make playoffs. Top ten team by some accounts
DONKS (5-7)

So, eight common games, and those 4. I fail to see what you are seeing.

 

[DisgruntledTunaFan]

And less not forget that they beat the CHARLIE FYE-lead Browns in wk 1.

 

[patriotspride]

Most overrated 9-3 record in the history of this league:

Pitt has had the easiest schedule in football: Check this out

Sunday, Sept. 9 @ Browns W 34-7 (1-0)
Sunday, Sept 16 vs. Bills W 26-3 (2-0)
Sunday, Sept. 23 vs. 49ers W 37-16 (3-0)
Sunday, Sept. 30 @ Cardinals L 21-14 (3-1)
Sunday, Oct. 7 vs. Seahawks W 21-0 (4-1)
Sunday, Oct. 14 Bye Week
Sunday, Oct. 21 @ Broncos L 31-28 (4-2)
Sunday, Oct. 28 @ Bengals W 24-13 (5-2)
Monday, Nov. 5 vs. Ravens W 38-7 (6-2)
Sunday, Nov. 11 vs. Browns W 31-28 (7-2)
Sunday, Nov. 18* @ Jets L 19-16 (7-3)
Monday, Nov. 26 vs. Dolphins W 3-0 (8-3)
Sunday, Dec. 2* vs. Bengals W 24-10 (9-3)

Has there been a weaker schedule in the history of this league, I don't think so.

Come on Black and gold fans, try and defend this schedule, how could you even lose 3 games on this list, they're all Pop Warner teams.

wow you aint kidding .that is one easy ass schedule.

 

[BradyToMoss]

DUDE. EIGHT of these GAMES are on the PATS schedule as well. The teams NOT on Pats schedule are:

NINERS (BAD)
CARDINALS (6-6) In the hunt
SEATTLE (8-4) Will win their Division and make playoffs. Top ten team by some accounts
DONKS (5-7)

So, eight common games, and those 4. I fail to see what you are seeing.

Correction my compadre, you forgot Denver, that putrid Denver Bronco team, they were not on our schedule.

What you fail to mention is that we beat the 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFL in their own backyard, funny how you forgot to mention that.

 

[ljuneau]

DUDE. EIGHT of these GAMES are on the PATS schedule as well. The teams NOT on Pats schedule are:

NINERS (BAD)
CARDINALS (6-6) In the hunt
SEATTLE (8-4) Will win their Division and make playoffs. Top ten team by some accounts
DONKS (5-7)

So, eight common games, and those 4. I fail to see what you are seeing.

Try replacing these with Chargers, Colts, Cowboys and Eagles. Then maybe you can see how laughable your argument is.

 

[Double G]

Naturally he left that part out, what else would you expect for the professional pot stirrer himself............

 

[He Ban Me]

Correction my compadre, you forgot Denver, that putrid Denver Bronco team, they were not on our schedule.

What you fail to mention is that we beat the 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFL in their own backyard, funny how you forgot to mention that.

correction?? I included Denver as one of the teams NOT on your schedule.
There have been 12 games played to date, of those 12, Pitt has EIGHT in common with NE. THREE of the FOUR that are NOT COMMON have a combined record of 19-17. I don't fail to mention squat. We are talking about the Pitt schedule, which is pretty similar to your own at this point. As stated before, their apparent "weak schedule" will have no bearing on this weekend's game. So funny how you guys are quick to defend when folks call out your opponents (earlier this season), yet you are so quick to jump on an opponents apparent "weak" schedule, only to have a full 66% of it identical to your own. Bwhahahahahahaha, good times.

 

[BradyToMoss]

correction?? I included Denver as one of the teams NOT on your schedule.
There have been 12 games played to date, of those 12, Pitt has EIGHT in common with NE. THREE of the FOUR that are NOT COMMON have a combined record of 19-17. I don't fail to mention squat. We are talking about the Pitt schedule, which is pretty similar to your own at this point. As stated before, their apparent "weak schedule" will have no bearing on this weekend's game. So funny how you guys are quick to defend when folks call out your opponents (earlier this season), yet you are so quick to jump on an opponents apparent "weak" schedule, only to have a full 66% of it identical to your own. Bwhahahahahahaha, good times.

Pitt has played 7 in common, NOT 8. We did not play Arizona, Denver, Seattle (who Pitt beat in Pitt, Seattle is a notoriously horrible road team, so that shoots down your top 10 argrument, if Pitt beat Seattle in Seattle, then you might have something, but Seattle is garbage on the road and always have been). So instead of losing to teams like the Jets (hahahahaha), Arizona and Denver INSTEAD THE PATS BEAT DALLAS, INDY AND SAN DIEGO. GET A GRIP MAN.........GIVE IT UP

 

[He Ban Me]

Try replacing these with Chargers, Colts, Cowboys and Eagles. Then maybe you can see how laughable your argument is.

I didn't think we were comparing game for game the strength of these two teams' schedules. If you want to rail on Pitts, who is similar to your own, then you have to start to question your SOS as well. Certainly, the 4 uncommon games are quite a bit different than Pitts. No question. In the end, the point is, what difference does all this make?? Because you feel Pitt has a weak schedule, you feel they pose no threat this weekend??? You feel the same about Baltimore too?? Eagles?? Keep telling yourself Pitt has no chance. And keep using this logic, you'll go far.

 

[letekro]

CARDINALS (6-6) In the hunt
QUOTE]

How long did it take you to think of something positive to say about this crappy team!?!......."In the hunt"....LOL!

 

[He Ban Me]

Pitt has played 7 in common, NOT 8. We did not play Arizona, Denver, Seattle (who Pitt beat in Pitt, Seattle is a notoriously horrible road team, so that shoots down your top 10 argrument, if Pitt beat Seattle in Seattle, then you might have something, but Seattle is garbage on the road and always have been). So instead of losing to teams like the Jets (hahahahaha), Arizona and Denver INSTEAD THE PATS BEAT DALLAS, INDY AND SAN DIEGO. GET A GRIP MAN.........GIVE IT UP

Sunday, Sept. 9 @ Browns W 34-7 (1-0) COMMON
Sunday, Sept 16 vs. Bills W 26-3 (2-0) COMMON
Sunday, Sept. 23 vs. 49ers W 37-16 (3-0)
Sunday, Sept. 30 @ Cardinals L 21-14 (3-1)
Sunday, Oct. 7 vs. Seahawks W 21-0 (4-1)
Sunday, Oct. 14 Bye Week
Sunday, Oct. 21 @ Broncos L 31-28 (4-2)
Sunday, Oct. 28 @ Bengals W 24-13 (5-2) COMMON
Monday, Nov. 5 vs. Ravens W 38-7 (6-2) COMMON
Sunday, Nov. 11 vs. Browns W 31-28 (7-2) COMMON
Sunday, Nov. 18* @ Jets L 19-16 (7-3) COMMON
Monday, Nov. 26 vs. Dolphins W 3-0 (8-3) COMMON
Sunday, Dec. 2* vs. Bengals W 24-10 (9-3) COMMON


PLEASE COUNT THE NUMBER OF TIMES YOU SEE THE WORD COMMON ABOVE.

 

[BradyToMoss]

I didn't think we were comparing game for game the strength of these two teams' schedules. If you want to rail on Pitts, who is similar to your own, then you have to start to question your SOS as well. Certainly, the 4 uncommon games are quite a bit different than Pitts. No question. In the end, the point is, what difference does all this make?? Because you feel Pitt has a weak schedule, you feel they pose no threat this weekend??? You feel the same about Baltimore too?? Eagles?? Keep telling yourself Pitt has no chance. And keep using this logic, you'll go far.

No one said Pitt can't give us a game, we know they can. All this thread is doing is pointing out that this Pittsburgh team MIGHT not be as great as this over-inflated 9-3 record might indicate based on the complete list of crap teams, week after week that they had to play. Simply stating facts.

If the Steelers went on the road like we did and beat either the Cowboys or the Colts, then my respect for them would be thru the roof. They've won 9 games against Division 2 teams and actually lost 3 games to Division 3 teams.

 

[thewarden86]

Try replacing these with Chargers, Colts, Cowboys and Eagles. Then maybe you can see how laughable your argument is.

The Chargers were struggling when you played them. They still aren't all that. The Eagles? They exposed your defense but they still aren't a winning team this year.

Again, two recycled QB's in a row picked apart your defense.

 

[He Ban Me]

CARDINALS (6-6) In the hunt
QUOTE]

How long did it take you to think of something positive to say about this crappy team!?!......."In the hunt"....LOL!

Hey, thanks man, you're right!!

As of today, they are IN the playoffs, my bad!


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=3142281

 

[BradyToMoss]

The Chargers were struggling when you played them. They still aren't all that. The Eagles? They exposed your defense but they still aren't a winning team this year.

Again, two recycled QB's in a row picked apart your defense.

I notice you had no comment about your team losing to the Jets, Cardinals or Broncos, Not to mention that piss-poor schedule. I'm not surprised.

Answer me this, do you think your Steeler team could go into Dallas and Indy and win like we did, be honest?