- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 33,218
- Reaction score
- 44,411
Explain exactly why you think this is so...This is a bad look for BB.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Explain exactly why you think this is so...This is a bad look for BB.
Whether it’s warranted or not, this is now the 3rd time the league has cracked down on them.Explain exactly why you think this is so...
Whether it’s warranted or not, this is now the 3rd time the league has cracked down on them.
that has nothing at all to do with what I asked YOU to produce. How in the world can anything be warranted on a person with ZERO culpability or knowledge of an occurrence to be responsible for it? Do you understand your implication?Whether it’s warranted or not, this is now the 3rd time the league has cracked down on them.
If this was on Bill we would’ve been hit with at least a 1 probably more picks and he would’ve been suspended.
Love the Seinfeld referenceWas there a single person anywhere that doubted that the Clown College of Park Avenue would apply the usual double standards to the Pats? The idea that they may actually give an entire segment of their dwindling fan base another reason to “Walk Away” almost certainly never occurred to them; no surprise from a group that needed a season’s worth of data to convince them of the validity of one of the most basic principles of science. To paraphrase Seinfeld: “If there's a [group of fans] that can take your presence for more than ten consecutive seconds, you should hang on to her like grim death. Which is not far off, by the way.”
always the revisionist history buffs with their capitulation speeches ready to roll. BB had ZERO....NOTHING to do with this travesty. Get educated completely on a subject matter before you make these proclamations
Nah that fine for Kraft was warranted.Should of been no penalty