upstater1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 30,279
- Reaction score
- 22,533
No, they didn't lose Brady over money.They did lose Brady over money though? Theyve lost Revis, chandler Jones, JC Jackson and Brady to name some over the past whatever 5-10 years let’s say. They lost JC the same way the Chiefs lost Tyreek. They didn’t have Cap room to sign JC either if you want to go that route. What you’re saying in theory makes sense, I just don’t think it works that’s way. Players get moved regardless of how much they pay/don’t pay IOL for example
As for the others, again, I'm emphasizing the salary cap. That's very different than saying they lost someone over money. In one instance, you CAN'T pay someone what they can get elsewhere. In the other instance, you WON'T. There's a very big difference. Besides, reports with Revis show we were close. Even with JC we offered close. But we had the $$ if we wanted.
We did have cap room to sign JC.











