- Joined
- Mar 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,807
- Reaction score
- 6,884
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're right they aren't the same, Mahomes has been to the AFC championship game every year as a starter. LOLYeah, Brady might have lost three Super Bowls, but in two of them, he scored the go ahead touchdown with a few minutes left in the 4th quarter, and in the other one, he set the Super Bowl record for yards, while also tossing 5 TDs
They are not the same
Who has the longer streak of making AFC championships?You're right they aren't the same, Mahomes has been to the AFC championship game every year as a starter. LOL
There’s a Mandela effect thing going with the second giants loss. Pats scored with 11:25 left in the third and went punt/pick/punt/downs the rest of the way
I think we blend the two Super Bowls together because Eli pulled another one out of his ass, and it would have been nice if the defense could’ve given Brady one of those, but unfortunately he didn’t score late in that game
You're right they aren't the same, Mahomes has been to the AFC championship game every year as a starter. LOL
No no, you’re not alone, everybody thinks that. I had the exact same thing in my mind until a couple years ago when I was just looking at the play-by-play of that game and realized damn, I remembered it wrongRight right, good call.
That's why everyone wanted to blame Welker.
At least three more SB wins made us forget that one...or, at least, I forgot it I guess
Jayden Daniels may have something to say about that.
He and Drake might emulate the Brady-Peyton rivalry. As long as the Patriot side follows the TB12 script I’m okay with that.
Fun fact: That Colts banner is now at the Barstool HQ.Cool thing about Brady-Manning was they were both in the same conference, at least until the Dolts took the opportunity to leave the AFC East.
The Dolts were in the AFC East because they were originally the Baltimore Colts.
Leaving Baltimore in the middle of the night was one scummy thing they did, and leaving the AFC East since they were tired of Bill and Brady kicking their ass every season was another.
**** that bunch of corn-fed hicks and their ****ing stadium filled with participation trophies.
Good comparison, but honestly I don’t see how any bias you might have plays into it. Looking at those numbers what would be the argument that the Chiefs are better during those years?Comparing the start of the Chiefs' "dynasty" to now vs. the same # of years of the end of the Patriots' dynasty:
Chiefs:
'18: AFC Championship Game loss (to Patriots)
'19: Super Bowl victory
'20: Super Bowl loss (not close)
'21: AFC Championship Game loss
'22: Super Bowl victory
'23: Super Bowl victory
'24: Super Bowl loss (not close)
Patriots:
'12: AFC Championship Game loss
'13: AFC Championship Game loss
'14: Super Bowl victory
'15: AFC Championship Game loss
'16: Super Bowl victory
'17: Super Bowl loss
'18: Super Bowl victory
The Chiefs and Patriots both won 3 titles across 5 seasons. The Chiefs had 1 more Super Bowl loss than the Patriots; however, both of the Chiefs' losses were not close, whereas the Patriots' loss was by a 1-score margin. The Patriots have 3 AFCCG losses vs. the Chiefs' 2, so it is a matter of being 1 game better in 1 season.
However, if you expand backwards by 1 year for each team - the '11 season for the Patriots was another Super Bowl berth (though a loss, but a close one), whereas the '17 season for the Chiefs was a Wild Card round loss (this was pre-Mahomes).
I'd say that all things considered, the Chiefs' run should be considered roughly equal to the back half of the Patriots' run. I would personally put the Patriots higher due to 28-3, having no blowout losses, and beating the Chiefs directly in 2018 in the AFCCG, but admittedly I am biased.
If you take the entirety of the Patriots' dynasty in totality from 2001 to 2018 into consideration, obviously the Patriots are better. There's no comparison. Of course, it remains to be seen how the remaining Chiefs seasons go, because potentially their run is not over. It certainly feels that way, though.
What are the odds that Mahomes soon to be 30 can match the rest of what Brady did?Comparing the start of the Chiefs' "dynasty" to now vs. the same # of years of the end of the Patriots' dynasty:
Chiefs:
'18: AFC Championship Game loss (to Patriots)
'19: Super Bowl victory
'20: Super Bowl loss (not close)
'21: AFC Championship Game loss
'22: Super Bowl victory
'23: Super Bowl victory
'24: Super Bowl loss (not close)
Patriots:
'12: AFC Championship Game loss
'13: AFC Championship Game loss
'14: Super Bowl victory
'15: AFC Championship Game loss
'16: Super Bowl victory
'17: Super Bowl loss
'18: Super Bowl victory
The Chiefs and Patriots both won 3 titles across 5 seasons. The Chiefs had 1 more Super Bowl loss than the Patriots; however, both of the Chiefs' losses were not close, whereas the Patriots' loss was by a 1-score margin. The Patriots have 3 AFCCG losses vs. the Chiefs' 2, so it is a matter of being 1 game better in 1 season.
However, if you expand backwards by 1 year for each team - the '11 season for the Patriots was another Super Bowl berth (though a loss, but a close one), whereas the '17 season for the Chiefs was a Wild Card round loss (this was pre-Mahomes).
I'd say that all things considered, the Chiefs' run should be considered roughly equal to the back half of the Patriots' run. I would personally put the Patriots higher due to 28-3, having no blowout losses, and beating the Chiefs directly in 2018 in the AFCCG, but admittedly I am biased.
If you take the entirety of the Patriots' dynasty in totality from 2001 to 2018 into consideration, obviously the Patriots are better. There's no comparison. Of course, it remains to be seen how the remaining Chiefs seasons go, because potentially their run is not over. It certainly feels that way, though.
What I was trying to say was that these two subsets of years should probably be considered equal, and that my bias makes me feel that the Patriots had a better run during that time. I can't envision any argument that would put the Chiefs ahead.Good comparison, but honestly I don’t see how any bias you might have plays into it. Looking at those numbers what would be the argument that the Chiefs are better during those years?
I was just comparing team to team so I didn't include Brady's 2020 win with Tampa. The 2011 Super Bowl loss is somewhat "baked in" for the Chiefs already, if they hypothetically make the AFCCG next year but lose, that would still put them roughly on-par with the final 8 years of the Pats, as both would still have the same number of SB appearances, SB wins and AFCCG appearances. But anything short of an AFCCG loss would drop the Chief's 8 year period lower than that same period for the Pats'.What are the odds that Mahomes soon to be 30 can match the rest of what Brady did?
3 out of 4
18-1
The 2011 SB loss
And the 2020 SB win
Even if he can replicate all that there is no way for him to beat Brady in a SB or conference championship
I'd say that all things considered, the Chiefs' run should be considered roughly equal to the back half of the Patriots' run. I would personally put the Patriots higher due to 28-3, having no blowout losses, and beating the Chiefs directly in 2018 in the AFCCG, but admittedly I am biased.
Brady has 8.Who has the longer streak of making AFC championships
My boy??You oughta back on out and go back to 36 hours ago when your boy was still riding the wave of make believe.
Brady has 8.
I thought so, but not sure now. 2011-2018
| 5 | 304 |
| 26 | 1K |
| 57 | 4K |
| 78 | 6K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











