Folks better recalibrate their core perceptions of how baseball teams should be constructed.
The Mets, utilizing the NY Yankee's 1990's team assembly strategy, just locked in a once every five day pitcher for $43.33 mill per year...that's 1/5 of their salary cap at a position that has been aggressively devalued in MLB
The Angels continue on a top heavy strategy with no playoff appearances since 2014 while no budget division foe Oakland plays in the post season 50% of the time.
Then there's the Rays
I absolutely endorse the Sox's new approach that values flexibility in this new mix and match era.
To think how much money the team has pissed away on garbage and/or injured high priced vets whose game day availability is too often in question, not to mention the roller coaster 1st to last swings in divisional standings.
Deploying Tampa metrics while having double the payroll to execute this strategy should pay dividends short and long term.
Minimizing/not having to eat tens of millions on horrendous, team crippling, long term contracts (Fat Panda, David Price, Allen Craig, Rusney Castillo, Pedroia etc etc etc) clearly is an organizational objective, as it should be.
Having money to burn doesn't mean you burn it.
Rooting for "no names" in this new mix and match baseball environment kind of sucks, I get it.
But listening to the Fenway crowd roar non stop in the playoffs as Chaim's computer generated roster gelled at the right time should give us all faith Chaim has a handle on this new stat driven era in baseball.
And the holes in this past season's roster that were problematic are now being addressed thanks to minimal dead money obligations that limited Chaim's options last off season.
At the same time, the farm is getting rebuilt and more trade chips are arriving every day.
If I owned a team, this would be my approach.
Then again, I'm a cheap bastard