- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 28,220
- Reaction score
- 30,864
Thanks. I put my whole forensic team on it.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Boston.com | Posted: 04/17 New! |
| Ian Rapoport: Patriots trading for A.J. Brown ‘most likely scenario’ this offseason |
The Athletic | Posted: 04/17 New! |
| What I'd do if I were in charge of the Patriots for the 2026 NFL Draft |
NBC Sports Boston | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Prioritizing power? Best offensive guard fits for Patriots in NFL Draft |
98.5 The Sports Hub | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Barth’s 2026 Felger & Mazz Big Board reactions: Defensive backs |
Patriots.com | Posted: 04/16 New! |
| Deuce's 2026 Patriots Mock Draft 2.0 |
| 2026 Draft: WR 4 Reactions | 04/16 at 8:22 pm |
| 2026 Pre-Draft Meetings 4 Reactions | 04/17 at 4:56 am |
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| manxman2601 | 26 posts | |
| DaBruinz | 17 posts | |
| DoubleDeluxe | 13 posts | |
| Clonamery | 12 posts | |
| PatsFan2 | 10 posts |
Thanks. I put my whole forensic team on it.
I got her beat
Why waste the “designated to return” label, when there’s a limited number of them? Bourne is a better candidate for that scenario. Just waive Polk injured and give him an injury settlement. He won’t have enough market value to worry about trying to trade him mid season. Besides Bourne is a known NFL starter who would be better for that too.I know this isn't going to be popular but it's not like the other WRs have been tearing it up. Doubtful but I'd still leave a small possibility that they still feel the potential that lead them to draft him in the first place is still better than the rest and he's WR6.
Doubtful so I think IR designated to return probably makes more sense than cutting him.
Use the insurance and then if everyone ahead of him is healthy and performing the trade deadline would be a good time to try and move him as he'd likely be healthy by then.
You very well could be right. I'm not writing anyone off mostly because they collectively all aren't stepping up to claim that last spot. If there even is a 6th spot to claim.Why waste the “designated to return” label, when there’s a limited number of them? Bourne is a better candidate for that scenario. Just waive Polk injured and give him an injury settlement. He won’t have enough market value to worry about trying to trade him mid season. Besides Bourne is a known NFL starter who would be better for that too.
Why waste the “designated to return” label, when there’s a limited number of them? Bourne is a better candidate for that scenario. Just waive Polk injured and give him an injury settlement. He won’t have enough market value to worry about trying to trade him mid season. Besides Bourne is a known NFL starter who would be better for that too.
Yep at least that got that right. It should be as many as you want/need with some restrictions. No other league has such things.For the record there are eight DTRs now, so it's a risk but not a huge risk.
I just got on board this week. No one else is stepping up and all we've heard is good things about him. I still waited until this week when we gave him more reps with the 1s and 2s and he did well.Seriously - everyone assuming that Chism is gonna make the roster has undeniable "Bam Childress is a lock" vibes to anyone who started rooting for this team before Tom Brady was an AARP member.
I don't like Polk, and I do like Chism but there's very recognizable patterns when it comes to preseason darlings if you've been rooting for this team for more than a few years and are currently able to legally buy alcohol...
I just got on board this week. No one else is stepping up and all we've heard is good things about him. I still waited until this week when we gave him more reps with the 1s and 2s and he did well.
I fought it hard too I didn't want to anoint him in the spring but at this point I'm pretty sure he's making the team. Long way to go after that to get play time so you still don't have to be fully sold but I don't see how he's not WR5 by now.
Teakwood has a serious shot at making the KC 53.
They taught him how to track the ball.
This just made me wonder if the problem with the Pats inability to draft rookie WRs and have them pan out has not been the draft selection, but the post-draft coaching and development. Could it be?Feel we have up on him too early.
Sorry I made some assumptions since Diggs, Pop, and Williams were basically safe entering camp and it became apparent very quickly after that Boutte had picked up where he left off last year and he was probably also safe. After that no one other than Chism has done anything significant.What does it mean no one else is stepping up? Boutte has seriously stepped up. Pop has had a good camp. Baker has stepped up and jumped on special teams. Polk and Bourne are gone. Its Diggs, Boutte, Pop, Williams, Hollins, Chism.
YuckI got her beat
No one is stepping up? I suspect that Vrabel thinks that Diggs, Boutte, Douglas, and Hollins are stepping up and doing all that was expected of them. Obviously, WIlliams is a rookie who isn't ready for major prime time reps, but that often happens with a talented rookieI just got on board this week. No one else is stepping up and all we've heard is good things about him. I still waited until this week when we gave him more reps with the 1s and 2s and he did well.
I fought it hard too I didn't want to anoint him in the spring but at this point I'm pretty sure he's making the team. Long way to go after that to get play time so you still don't have to be fully sold but I don't see how he's not WR5 by now.
| 125 | 11K |
| 33 | 2K |
| 15 | 923 |
| 23 | 4K |
| 176 | 21K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











