ashley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,926
- Reaction score
- 33,922
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
TJ Hockenson is a more complete TE than Fant.
Agree. Bill wants an impact player on the line.I think we go D-line or tight end with this pick. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if we traded either.
I think we go D-line or tight end with this pick. Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if we traded either.
TJ Hockenson is a more complete TE than Fant.
Agree. That's why they are moving up.I don’t think it will be DL because there is going to be such a big run on front 7 defenders that they would be getting the 4th or 5th best prospect at their position. That, however, is predicated on their board looking like the consensus choices at those positions. I think there is a strong likelihood they go offense in the 1st, as there should be better options at that point in the draft.
For whom?Agree. That's why they are moving up.
Pick a DT/DL/Edge of your choosing.For whom?
totally irrelevant
Hockenson will be long, long gone
TJ Hockenson is a more complete TE than Fant.
Nope.Pick a DT/DL/Edge of your choosing.
You believe the DL as currently constituted is good enough?Nope.
Agree. Bill wants an impact player on the line.
Set at ILB, CB, OLB, SS and FS
Might add a DMc and Chung replacement Day 2
No. But to get a top 5 player will cost you the flexibility of this draft and your #1 next year. The DL need can be found not trading up or trading up a few spots.You believe the DL as currently constituted is good enough?
My apologies. I was under the impression that Fant was the considered (by NFL/collegiate pundits) the superior player and thus would be drafted higher. After further research, I see that most mocks have Hockenson being selected before Fant.No question, he's one of the most complete TE prospects in years. But he wasn't one of the options in the poll.
I think of the draft as finding future starters. Is it your position that we are set at LB and S for 2020? I think that we need a top youngster at both positions.
How many cuts from last year's team are you projecting?No. But to get a top 5 player will cost you the flexibility of this draft and your #1 next year. The DL need can be found not trading up or trading up a few spots.
I think this draft has these best group of DL prospects in years and the NEP need to take advantage of it.
As I said earlier they can get a developmental, but talented player at S Day 2 as they won't play immediately anyway.