- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 22,880
- Reaction score
- 15,718
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.New sweatshirts this week: Go Cards!
Across the NFL defenses are bringing the heat. I do not notice any teams stuck in a 3 - 4 defense. Rex Ryan used to drop 8 and rush 3 vs Brady. Brady had time but no outlets.I don’t know who to believe anymore. Reiss says it is a blocking breakdown and Evan Lazar in his breakdown says that was blocked correctly and the free rusher was expected and that Mac should have known that a free rusher was coming and adjust and play accordingly.
We need them.with all due respect to Mike Reiss, he seems to have become a Mac Jones apologist.
Honestly starting to think the 2 INTs where a breakdown in OLine was on Mac's adjustments/calls.I don’t know who to believe anymore. Reiss says it is a blocking breakdown and Evan Lazar in his breakdown says that was blocked correctly and the free rusher was expected and that Mac should have known that a free rusher was coming and adjust and play accordingly.
I think a lot of teams would do that, but I don't think Bill will do that. I think he'll sign that street free agent from Purdue and start him before he starts Cunningham. He'd rather keep him on the WR track.Floating this idea.
We have 2 games coming up in 4 days. v.Chargers & @Steelers.
Then we have 11 days off preparing for Mon night v. Chiefs.
Presuming Mac/Zappe rotate back and forth these next 2 games - and presuming they keep sucking as bad as they do...
What if Pats use the mini-bye to prep Malik to take the last 4 games?
Why not? What do you have to lose... or gain (by playing Mac & Zappe, who have no part in the future of this team)