- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,682
- Reaction score
- 22,511
Yeah the patriots lost.So that means Cam won.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah the patriots lost.So that means Cam won.
Her skills could also be relevant, thoughI would need to see a picture before I could say whether or not I would make that decision
Cam vs Mac. Harry vs Wilkerson. The rumor is they disagree on all things Patriot related. It's almost Brady/Belichick forum posting level from what the media is saying.Are we still talking about covid? Or....
I’m actually really excited with how much good press Agholor has received, and Bourne/Meyers have gotten quite a bit too. Tentatively hyped about the WRs.There's been nothing but good news so far about Agholar, Bourne and Meyers.
There has been good news, but Agholar has a continuing problem of dropping passes behind the defense. Meyers has been perhaps the most consistent WR, but the value for those 3 is out of whack. Huge $ for the 2 FAs who will not bring the value of, say, Rashod Bateman. Still paying for the bad drafting. Group will be improved without a doubt, but looks like a merely average group to me with 3 NFL quality WRs and no top 10 guy.There's been nothing but good news so far about Agholar, Bourne and Meyers.
There has been good news, but Agholar has a continuing problem of dropping passes behind the defense. Meyers has been perhaps the most consistent WR, but the value for those 3 is out of whack. Huge $ for the 2 FAs who will not bring the value of, say, Rashod Bateman. Still paying for the bad drafting. Group will be improved without a doubt, but looks like a merely average group to me with 3 NFL quality WRs and no top 10 guy.
I agree but with the expected production of the 2 very good tes, a rock solid run game, very good ol and the possibility of Mac at qb, all 3 of those wrs are gonna see plenty of single coverage. So 3 quality but not star wrs could be enough.There has been good news, but Agholar has a continuing problem of dropping passes behind the defense. Meyers has been perhaps the most consistent WR, but the value for those 3 is out of whack. Huge $ for the 2 FAs who will not bring the value of, say, Rashod Bateman. Still paying for the bad drafting. Group will be improved without a doubt, but looks like a merely average group to me with 3 NFL quality WRs and no top 10 guy.
Lol you beat me to the punch. But I already posted my reply b4 I saw yoursI get what you're saying, but less than a 3rd of the league has a "top 10 guy" at WR, by definition. A team with 3 quality NFL WR's (if that's what they end up being) plus two TE who were the #1 TE on their teams last year, plus a top five OL will be just fine on offense... assuming they get reasonable QB play, which is obviously still a question to be answered.
“Just fine” = average. They can be good enough as long as the TEs remain healthy. The more we have to lean on them the less comfortable I will be. Not being pessimistic; If healthy they should be much improved. Gone from worst to ok. But this position group is not on the same level as TE, RB or OL. WR and QB look like the weakest positions on that side of the ball, no?I get what you're saying, but less than a 3rd of the league has a "top 10 guy" at WR, by definition. A team with 3 quality NFL WR's (if that's what they end up being) plus two TE who were the #1 TE on their teams last year, plus a top five OL will be just fine on offense... assuming they get reasonable QB play, which is obviously still a question to be answered.
There’s tons of beautiful women out there cscirpoli.I would need to see a picture before I could say whether or not I would make that decision
Apparently there are still those that don't think TEs and RBs are allowed to be part of a whole team passing offense and that there is no salary cap.looks like a merely average group to me with 3 NFL quality WRs and no top 10 guy.
I get what you’re saying, but he’s specifically talking about WR’s.Apparently there are still those that don't think TEs and RBs are allowed to be part of a whole team passing offense and that there is no salary cap.
What’s brutal to consider is that the Pats could’ve drafted 2 top ten guys in one draft alone in 2019. Plus, throwing in Myers and they’d be set for years. And this is not hindsight as the Pats were in dire need of young talent at the WR going into the 2019 offseason.I get what you're saying, but less than a 3rd of the league has a "top 10 guy" at WR, by definition. A team with 3 quality NFL WR's (if that's what they end up being) plus two TE who were the #1 TE on their teams last year, plus a top five OL will be just fine on offense... assuming they get reasonable QB play, which is obviously still a question to be answered.
Some might consider 1.5 games less than a season.JAG was lousy in camp, but was solid when got into the games (until he broke like a china doll).
There has been good news, but Agholar has a continuing problem of dropping passes behind the defense. Meyers has been perhaps the most consistent WR, but the value for those 3 is out of whack. Huge $ for the 2 FAs who will not bring the value of, say, Rashod Bateman. Still paying for the bad drafting. Group will be improved without a doubt, but looks like a merely average group to me with 3 NFL quality WRs and no top 10 guy.
I expect everyone would. But that doesn't change the discussion.Some might consider 1.5 games less than a season.
But I can't remember anytime a QB, especially a rookie, played poorly in camp and went on to have success in the regular season.
I think more Yogi Berra than fortune cookiethat's fortune cookie quality right there from BB
| 149 | 13K |
| 310 | 26K |
| 195 | 14K |
| 502 | 38K |
| 162 | 12K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 29 - May 14 (Through 26yrs)











