- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 21,746
- Reaction score
- 15,946
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Let me get this straight.Wow! John Simon looks like a better player on tape than Clayborn. I know we are depleted some but it wouldn't surprise me if one move Clayborn is a healthy scratch going forward. I don't think you pay FA good $$$$ for them to suck. I think BB over evaluated one game Clayborn last FA.
Wow! John Simon looks like a better player on tape than Clayborn. I know we are depleted some but it wouldn't surprise me if one move Clayborn is a healthy scratch going forward. I don't think you pay FA good $$$$ for them to suck. I think BB over evaluated one game Clayborn last FA.
Clayborn’s sack number were lacking outside of that one game. His overall pressure performance was perfectly acceptable even outside that one game.Wow! John Simon looks like a better player on tape than Clayborn. I know we are depleted some but it wouldn't surprise me if one move Clayborn is a healthy scratch going forward. I don't think you pay FA good $$$$ for them to suck. I think BB over evaluated one game Clayborn last FA.
Clayborn’s sack number were lacking outside of that one game. His overall pressure performance was perfectly acceptable even outside that one game.