I choose to formulate opinions on my own, not based on public perception. I do not know the police officers investigating the case, and I do not know Jones personally. Therefore, I have assigned equal levels of trust to them. I've studied numerous cases where officers have acted unethically and dishonestly to make a case. While I am not accusing these officers of doing so, it happens. Look at what happened to the kids at the center of the Duke Lacrosse case.
That was a lawyer not a cop, al of the stuff in the Duke cae can be traced back to the lawyer. Nice that since you don't actually know the people involved you assign equal trust regardless of the situation...lets see here guys that get paid regardless if the charge someone or not and will make 0$$ more and provide absolutely no benefit to thier lives 50%, someoen that would go to jail and lose millions and thier defense if charged will cost them at least a mill 50% truthful, yep sounds about right.
A question for you: is someone who is accused of, let alone convicted of a crime, no matter how insignificant the crime may be, less 'trustworthy' in your mind? Can someone ever earn that trust back? Just a question.
Well since we are not talking "insignificant" it is a moot point. Want me to list the incidenst he has been involved in the last three years? You never answerd my question. So you believe he doesn't know the shooter that was sitting next to him in the club holding his bag of money and got into the same car as him? Just a question.
I do not know Pacman Jones. I do not pretend to know the exact accounts of what went on in Las Vegas. But I will not presume guilt upon someone unless they are convicted, or enough facts are out there where I can make an educated decision on my own.
well I guess my friends aren't trustworthy and the interviews and video that they watched isn't enough but thanks I will believe them rather than third or fourth hand accounts of a version from "pac" the thug you can stay in your world it will serve you well in court.