- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,911
- Reaction score
- 18,039
I agree but it does look like they're mortgaging a bit of their future looking at some of the contracts with voidable years but at the same time they are in a win now mode after they've just won so who can fault them for that? How long they could prolong the win now mode is beyond me.
They are in year 2 of going all in. There are alot of bombs set to go off in two seasons:
Brady 45+
Godwin due 20+ million a year
Evans due a similar extension
an average LT making elite money
the interior OL are FAs
Gronk’s retirement
JPP decline
Suh decline
Vea FA
David FA
nearly the entire secondary FA
Similar spot to the early 2010s ravens, mid 2010s seahawks & late 2010s eagles & pats. These team’s usually don’t draft well in the late 20s/30s (Chiefs already whiffing with Frank Clark trade & an average RB) & don’t replace these players adequately.
This “mortgaging the future” GM’s spew is the reason why they don’t win a Lombardi and why most of them eventually end up getting fired. And I’m only referring to the ones that have good teams and/or an elite QB.
For example, you have a Bucs team that’s been to the playoffs TWICE since 2002 before Brady showed up. They have the GOAT QB who just won the easiest Super Bowl of his career. They should not think twice about the “future” because they they weren’t winning anything before and odds are they probably won’t win much after Brady leaves. Maximize what you have now! The Bucs are doing the right thing retaining everyone they can.
Green Bay should take notice and stop penny pinching. Rodgers will never win there and his 11 year drought continues.
Despite that, I’m with this philosophy for the Bucs due to Tom’s age. The Saints did the same thing with Brees anyway. Not sold it’s smart business with a QB in their prime as the Seahawks have been stuck with an elite QB & an average team for awhile.
Last edited:












