I understand your point about its not being technically murder, but such technicalities are trivial at this point, and you are a cowardly punk for making that the core of your reaction to this. As for what I would have done, I would have assisted others in restraining the killer, and would have been entirely content with whatever degree of suffering he incurred in the process. You, I assume, would have been madly scribbling little notes about legal trivialities.
I'm a coward because I said that beating people up is how we got here in the first place?
Stay out of it if you're gonna make it personal. Dude was killed. My argument was that we don't start beating on people cause two dudes are fighting in the stands.
You wanna get involved? Throw a fist and kill someone? Over a fight that has nothing to do with you? Well you're the coward.
Edit
I never trivialized this. This person was killed and whomever did it needs to pay a price. I was simply saying in reply to someone else that perhaps beating the person up wasn't the correct action. You're reply says as much as you advocate for restraining.
Theres alot at play here. First off, no one could realistically know the guy was actually dying. That's not something you see in a fight all the time. The guy who died was also engaging in the scuffle and putting him self in a bad spot. He didn't deserve to die but he shouldn't also be out here trying to fight anyone.
I've also read that the person who punched him isn't even the person he was engaged with. So that brings a whole new element of wtf.
I am not supporting him in the least. Whatever the maximum punishment is for killing someone should be what he gets. No excuse for it. I was simply saying that maybe throwing fist on him wouldn't be appropriate considering that's how we got here in the first place.