- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,333
- Reaction score
- 105,293
You also said he hasn't been good the last 10 years and you are wrong.His last major was 2008
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You also said he hasn't been good the last 10 years and you are wrong.His last major was 2008
He’s sucked for most of the last ten years and for like 3 has been well below his standard. If it was a 10 year list he wouldn’t sniff it.You also said he hasn't been good the last 10 years and you are wrong.
He’s sucked for most of the last ten years
Throw out his standard. For the last 3 hes been either horrible or injured. If he didn't win 14 Majors he'd be lucky to keep his card.and for like 3 has been well below his standard.
If it was a 10 year list he wouldn’t sniff it.
Anybody who can look at Tiger Woods...observe how he dominated his competition for years during his prime, especially in Major Championships...see the work he put into being in top physical condition and the toll the game took on his body...and say that he doesn't belong on a list of top/dominating athletes of the last 20 years...either thinks Professional Golf is still played by overweight guys who smoke and have a brew or two during a round or is someone who just plain doesn't understand sports.
The last professional golfer who, for a while at least, got away with winning major championships while out of shape, smoking and drinking was John Daly...and his is a story of a talent wasted if there ever was one...we will never know how good he could have been.
Or they think a list talking about the last 20 years should focus more on athletes who have been dominant for the majority of that timeframe and not half of it.
Also not a single person said Tiger didn’t deserve to be on the list. Some of you guys need to learn to read better
I'm not a big Tiger fan either but what he has accomplished is insane.This times like 9 million
FWIW I am not a tiger fan at all either
I'm not a big Tiger fan either but what he has accomplished is insane.
...and thats really the key pertaining to this silly article.He’s the first person I think of when I think of dominance
That’s how I see it. Tiger was more dominant but Jack is the GOAT...and thats really the key pertaining to this silly article.
Jack won 14 majors in 14 years an in those Majors has 44 top 10 finishes out of 56 starts at a Major. That is nuts.
Tiger won 14 Majors in 12 years and in those Majors has 29 top 10s out of 46 starts at a Major .
So you can argue Tiger was more dominant in a shorter span than Jack but he wasn't as consistent.
No most people disagreed with the ESPN list ranking him number 1There’s multiple people in here that have