- Joined
- Nov 26, 2009
- Messages
- 9,261
- Reaction score
- 8,745
There is no question that this edition of the Patriots is not a threat to any team with a capable offense. We knew the Ravens had an explosive attack coming into this one. We also knew the Ravens' defense was completely suspect (and still is.) When you turn the ball over four times and go 2 for 9 on 3rd downs, you're not going get a win. I don't see a coherent approach on offense, especially with a young QB who is very inconsistent with his throws and what appears to be an inability to reliably anticipate what the defense is going to do after the ball is snapped.Tell us about Jones' injury, and we'll give you a more informed answer. But, while waiting on that info, let's just say that even reasonable people should at least be noticing cracks in the sky.
I'm fairly comfortable with the capabilities of the defense to keep them in games, but the offense needs a serious re-focus on who their best best players are and what they do well. Four turnovers puts too much pressure on any defense.
The passing game feels right when Mac Jones runs play-action and makes quick reads, although the first INT against the Ravens was play-action and a 20-yard throw into coverage (three defenders around Agholor.) Out of the shotgun, Mac Jones sails the ball consistently putting his receivers at risk and creating interceptions or 50-50 balls. All three INTs yesterday were throws to the defenders - no great plays by Ravens were involved.
I'm wondering if you agree that the Patriots strengths on offense are a) the running game, b) their tight ends, and c) Kendrick Bourne and Devante Parker (when Jacoby Meyers is not in the game.) That's plenty of options to work with. It means they get Bourne on the field as much as possible, find Hunter Henry often, and pound the rock. Their strength lies in moving the chains, chewing up clock with only the occasional shot down the sidelines to keep the safeties honest.