- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 33,487
- Reaction score
- 19,274
The Pats seem to think he's a better fit at guard, though, and seem reluctant to move him.Not a crazy suggestion.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Pats seem to think he's a better fit at guard, though, and seem reluctant to move him.Not a crazy suggestion.
BB could take a kid that mobs up sweat in the lockerroom in the 4th round and Debruniz would say but he is the best mopper ever.and i give you examples of drafted and undrafted kickers who were great too as an argument but you will anyway support your BS claims to defend BB no matter what
but isn't gostkowski cherry picking as well because it is only one example?B
Gostkowski was a 4th rounder that didn't bust. There is no point in cherry picking the kicker you want to compare to. Silly discussion point expected from the board drama queens but you are a good poster.
He’s also reaching the age where we to look for his replacement. And he couldn’t handle kickoff duties after Bailey went down. Think I saw a stat were he was like 10% in getting an actual touchback on a kickoff last season.Last time we took a kicker was in the 5th round and he never played, our current kicker was 10-14 in kicks 40-50 and 5 for 6 in over 50 last year...
He was a chiefs fan, his work here was done.He’s probably in therapy.
That'd be a reason why the Pats would want to draft a K in the 4th versus the 5th.rohrwasser was a fifth rd pick how did that work out?
hardly. It was the last lines of the player's overviews. Basically their opinion. Take it for what it is. Misery? I couldn't care less actually.No, you’re cherry picking a negative excerpt (which would apply to most players taken in the later rounds). Enjoy wallowing in your misery.
but isn't gostkowski cherry picking as well because it is only one example?
Thanks i enjoy reading your posts!
I'm not you. I use MULTIPLE websites. As was pointed out to you, different websites had him rated differently. Try paying attention.and you are telling people that you dont have a website of where he was projected. Someone asked where he was projected.
Probably, but it seems like unless this kid is kicking 80 yard fg's and has 30 tackles on special teams Its hard to account for a 4th rounder on a trade up so basically we gave up a 4th and a 5th for himHe’s also reaching the age where we to look for his replacement. And he couldn’t handle kickoff duties after Bailey went down. Think I saw a stat were he was like 10% in getting an actual touchback on a kickoff last season.
I agree that you don't understand.Why are we not addressing WR at all.
Even if Bill says he is happy with what is there there was serious talent on the board.
I just don’t understand.
That and the fact that we don't have a 5th.That'd be a reason why the Pats would want to draft a K in the 4th versus the 5th.
Oh....well lets see all the pages that have him as a 4th round projection.I'm not you. I use MULTIPLE websites. As was pointed out to you, different websites had him rated differently. Try paying attention.
Clearly you do care or else you wouldn’t go out of your way to frame the pick in a negative light. But that’s totally in character for you, isn’t it.hardly. It was the last lines of the player's overviews. Basically their opinion. Take it for what it is. Misery? I couldn't care less actually.
because i view this year as crucial for mac and the pats to identify what we have in our qb so i want the pats to surround mac with support at OT and WR in the fourth and not a KYes. So you could make a positive or negative cherry pick. You chose to go negative and complain. why?
| 59 | 2K |
| 13 | 502 |
| 7 | 361 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)









