- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,693
- Reaction score
- 22,522
Nothing in there is an insult. It’s what you have said.Thanks for your OPINIONS. You are throwing around insults pretty heavily. Usually a sign of a losing argument. Have a good day.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Nothing in there is an insult. It’s what you have said.Thanks for your OPINIONS. You are throwing around insults pretty heavily. Usually a sign of a losing argument. Have a good day.
I wouldn’t want Brown. Players they Ins to shoot their way off winning teams are a problem waiting to happen.If you were the Pats brain trust, would you trade your 2026 1st rounder for AJ Brown + PHI's 2026 3rd rounder?
Would you trade your 2026 2nd rounder for Jordan Addison, straight up?
Why would the Vikings trade Addison? They're already preparing for life after Nailor, why wouldn't they try to move him instead of Addison?No. Yes.
You do realize that for years still shots (all 22 view) is how NFL STAFFS analyzed plays in-game right? They generally use tablets now but this is a strange take.It was man coverage on an all out blitz.
Yes You are making things up when you say maybe the other was equal but they just played him for stupid reasons.
Analyzing football with screen shots? Ugh
It was not man coverage or an all out blitz, it was a zone coverage with a corner blitz, Dugger was responsible for the deep half.It was man coverage on an all out blitz.
Yes You are making things up when you say maybe the other was equal but they just played him for stupid reasons.
Analyzing football with screen shots? Ugh
They didn’t use 2 still shots on a play to assess how a player played during that play.You do realize that for years still shots (all 22 view) is how NFL STAFFS analyzed plays in-game right? They generally use tablets now but this is a strange take.
Such an odd hill to die on. Even if we stipulate that Dugger wasn’t absolutely awful in coverage (I can’t), he’s totally ignoring the economic impact that getting out of a terrible contract will have on future seasons. That was the driver.Can we ban Andy from this thread? It has just turned into 10 pages of him arguing about how great Kyle Dugger is.
He was left on an island with Olave.It was not man coverage or an all out blitz, it was a zone coverage with a corner blitz, Dugger was responsible for the deep half.
Thats not making anything up, im merely suggesting a couple potential reasons I think Dugger could've gotten the nod.
You mean analyzing football with film lmao? Yes, that is what I am doing...
He was left on an island with Olave.
Yes when you say maybe blah blah blah you are making things up.
You aren’t analyzing with film you posted 2 still shots. Film would show the entire play.
2nd rounder yes as we have the history of always screwing those picksIf you were the Pats brain trust, would you trade your 2026 1st rounder for AJ Brown + PHI's 2026 3rd rounder?
Would you trade your 2026 2nd rounder for Jordan Addison, straight up?
I watched that play multiple times…Dugger didn’t even account for the possibility that Olave would run a go. He sat on what he expected to be a shorter route. In a vacuum, that’s “it happens”. But given they blitzed the corner, I am certain he wasn’t supposed to sit on a dig.No, I analyzed the film and used the screen shots and a paragraph to illustrate my point because I dont feel like creating a video for you.
Once again, if a safety cant handle being asked to cover a deep zone then he is no good. If Davis never blitzed he likely would've been responsible for a different zone and Dugger still would've gotten burnt. Safeties are going to be responsible for making plays downfield one on one all the time, its not the same as being "left on an island" like you're framing it. He wasnt asked to line up on top of him and cover him wherever he goes 1 on 1 like a Revis, he was just responsible for covering him if he goes deep, which he failed to do.
That’s not the okay you posted still shots ofNo, I analyzed the film and used the screen shots and a paragraph to illustrate my point because I dont feel like creating a video for you.
Once again, if a safety cant handle being asked to cover a deep zone then he is no good. If Davis never blitzed he likely would've been responsible for a different zone and Dugger still would've gotten burnt. Safeties are going to be responsible for making plays downfield one on one all the time, its not the same as being "left on an island" like you're framing it. He wasnt asked to line up on top of him and cover him wherever he goes 1 on 1 like a Revis, he was just responsible for covering him if he goes deep, which he failed to do.
Show me where I said Dugger was great.Can we ban Andy from this thread? It has just turned into 10 pages of him arguing about how great Kyle Dugger is.
Right his #1 responsibility there is to not get beat deep, if Olave goes inside whatsoever his teammates are there. If he sits for a dig it’ll be a completion but that’s what they’re giving up by blitzing the corner, Dugger should’ve been making sure he doesn’t run deep on him.I watched that play multiple times…Dugger didn’t even account for the possibility that Olave would run a go. He sat on what he expected to be a shorter route. In a vacuum, that’s “it happens”. But given they blitzed the corner, I am certain he wasn’t supposed to sit on a dig.
I assume you meant to say play? I never said it was?That’s not the okay you posted still shots of
| 4 | 2K |
| 877 | 92K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 7 - May 22 (Through 26yrs)










