- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 40,230
- Reaction score
- 46,143
I think it makes plenty of sense if they could go the entire season only playing against 2 WR offenses with a receiving tight end (big nickel) or 3 WRs on obvious passing downs (3CB/3S dime), but then what do you do on first down against three wide receivers, a tight end, and a running back? They've historically had problems with nickel run defense so taking a DT off the field sounds like a disaster, the two linebackers are obviously going to be on the field almost every snap that they're healthy, and my premise here is that the third CB is somebody other than one of those three safeties. I'm just not seeing how those numbers add up.
I just don't think in today's NFL where match ups are important that there are 11 starters. I think Weddle would be too pricey for the amount of time he's on the field but in this scenario, I imagine Weddle would come off the field to be replaced by Coleman when we go up against 3 WR.











