I agree Neal regarding the value of a roster spot. But 'MB 2016' is a no brainer. That production being given a roster spot is a slam dunk compared to bubble players. (we have 4 active TEs now. Can that continue?)
"Peanuts", relatively, for cost is accurate and that is the part that has me puzzled. Why would all other 30 other teams pass on 'MB 2016' when the cost is peanuts and the signing is without 2018 or beyond cost exposure (unless the team decided to keep MB-MB wanted to stay)?
I assure you I am ecstatic about the MB signing if he is healthy/will be healthy and ready to play. I'm just searching for how this could happen. And the explanation that adds up is: MB wanted back on the Patriots, actively worked to get cut from GB (he did announce his "retirement" a few weeks ago which had to piss off GB), and it was quietly made known to the other 30 that he had no intention of being a happy camper or playing for them. And with GB's undisclosed injury claim, one possibility is MB was saying he was injured to help facilitate his departure (what other explanation is there for this "undisclosed" injury? Doesn't GB have doctors?)
If that's not the explanation, I just don't see how anything else adds up to a productive blocking/receiving TE, at the cost of peanuts, little cap exposure and no guaranteed future commitment, healthy/ready to play(?), getting passed over by every other team to land on the SB winning-15 year dominant franchise NE Patriots.
I don't care TBH how he got back to the Patriots if MB 2016 is back. But when something seems to good to be true it probably...(needs to be seen first)