Rich<3TheWoodhead
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 65
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Most of the rushing yards the Pats gave up were runs up the middle where the Jets doubled up Wilfork and Love.
Carter has a great motor work ethic etc. credit due.
if they can bring this pass rush with them in the playoffs they will be unstopable
There will be much better quarterbacks and much better teams than the jets in the playoffs.
This
The Jets are horrible, Sanchez is beyond bad. A half decent QB will light up the secondary, although i thought Moore looked good last night
This
The Jets are horrible, Sanchez is beyond bad. A half decent QB will light up the secondary, although i thought Moore looked good last night
No.
I've got no beef with the rest of your post, but as for this....
No. Just, no.
If you listen to 3 hours of brainwashing jibber jabber by Collingsworth/Michaeals this may be true, but after closer review of the ballwashing about how great the Jets are.. it simply is not true.
They have 2 really good offensive lineman, the rest of them not as much so.
Actually. I do think that the O-line of the Jets is one of their stronger attributes (which admittedly doesn't say much). The bigger problem is that Sanchez sucks so bad, he makes them look worse then they actually are.
Stronger attributes is not the same as "great", though. That's a 2 player line, with Mangold being the best in the business at his position and D'Bust being a pretty solid, but wildly overrated, left tackle. The rest of the starters, and all of the backups, are just at various levels of suck.
Actually. I do think that the O-line of the Jets is one of their stronger attributes (which admittedly doesn't say much). The bigger problem is that Sanchez sucks so bad, he makes them look worse then they actually are.
Sanchez had that deer in the headlights look all damn game last night. We were getting pressure because of his poor play as much as from the o-line (although D-brick had a bad game). A lot of our sacks came well into play cuz Sanchez had NO IDEA what to do with the ball last night.
As an O-line, you really should only have to protect for 3-5 seconds on pass plays, not 8-10. If your QB is gonna hold the ball that long, NO O-Line is gonna look good.
I thought Brandon Moore was allegedly pretty decent. Can't say for certain as I haven't really focused on him...ever.
Slauson and Hunter are terrible, agreed.
Seriously. How many times did Anderson knife in there? He looked fantastic, and so many times he got the initial pressure on Sanchez, and Carter cleaned up.
Say what you want about the Jets O -- but they do have a great offensive line. After ditching Haynesworth and making Shaun Ellis a rotational guy, Mark Anderson got his first start where he saw the majority of the snaps at LDE. He had 4.5 sacks as just a situational guy playing very, very sparingly. Clearly, more reps helped him out. He was so good tonight at pressuring Sanchez that -- as Collinsworth pointed out -- the Jets kept a TE to that side and kept Tomlinson in to pass block on that side too. The result? He got pressure and freed up Andre Carter - who lined up against D'Brick, with no help - and those two were able to generate more pressure tonight than all season long; when Carter was really the only constant pass rush threat. 4.5 sacks for him. 0.5 for Anderson, with many pressures. Best pass rush NE has shown in a long time.
But we need to credit Mark Anderson just as much as anyone. I think he is legit. With an actual pass rush tandem; this team could be so much better, especially with the injured players coming back.
while it still remains to be seen if they can consistently apply pressure like they did last night, hats off to the BB and the rest of the coaching staff for coming up with that scheme/paring.
That was what this D needed, it truely is amazing how a good pass rush makes a secondary better. A secondary of no-names was able to cover their respective receivers because the DL and the LB were getting to the QB consistently.
Now to consistently do that week-in and week-out.
| 11 | 2K |
| 5 | 780 |
| 2 | 572 |
| 1 | 450 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











