RayClay
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2005
- Messages
- 26,958
- Reaction score
- 9,712
This is a phrase I hear a lot. Why do the Pats seem to get an easy divisional games so much and does it make much of a difference? Well lets look at each year in the Brady/BB run.
2001 - Raiders, Steelers, Rams - No tomato can games and won the superbowl.
2003 - Titans, Colts, Panthers - No tomato can games and won the superbowl.
2004 - Indy, Steelers, Eagles - No tomato can games and won the superbowl.
2005 - Jags, Broncos - 1 tomato can game and lost in divisional round.
2006 - Jets, Chargers, Colts - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and lost in AFCCG
2007 - Jags, Chargers, Giants - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and lost in the SB.
2009 - Ravens - 1 tough game and lost in the divisional round.
2010 - Jets - 1 game (arguably tomato can or tough) and lost in divisional round.
2011 - Denver, Baltimore Giants - 1 tomato can game, 1 tough game and lost in the SB
2012 - Texans, Ravens - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and lost in AFCCG.
2013 - Colts, Bronco - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and lost in the AFCCG
2014 - Ravens, Colts, Seahawks - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and won the SB
2015 - Chiefs, Denver - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and lost in AFCCG.
2016 - Texans, Steelers, Falcons - 1 tomato can game and 1 tough game and won SB.
2017 - TBD (Beat the Titans though)
In 14 runs we have a good amount of info. We can try to break it down but it deals with a lot of unknowns.
Personally I am just going to post it and let people make their own opinions on if it matters or not and how to look at it.
When you're the top seed, you get a low seed.
Stop reading tomato head and you'll stop hearing about tomato cans.












