- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 10,629
- Reaction score
- 18,783
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
not saying the pats should get manziel, but hoyer gives you nothing
He gives you a reliable backup. I don't think Manziel knows how to spell "reliable."
Roster size is 90. If Johnny "Camp Arm" Manzel does don want a big contract why not kick the tires? Are you idiots really upset he might take the spot of the 9th safety whose name no one will learn?
Everyone who works with or plays for the Browns is drunk
He might take the spot of the future Malcolm Butler or Jonathan Jones. We know what Manziel is at this point. Any UDFA seems more interesting to bring in than him.
Again, I’m not an advocate for Manziel, but Hoyer is garbage.....he’s reliable as long as he doesn’t play
Nah, man. They’re likely stuck with Hoyer for another year. He would actually cost the team about 600k if he’s cut. Also, no matter who they bring in, those players aren’t going to know the first thing about anything, let alone be able to run our offense as a backup. As you know, that’s not exactly a plug and play position.No one is proposing he starts and he probably is cut once they acquire a couple other QBs.
The one thing Hoyer gives us is experience in knowing our offense, and that alone gives him a leg up on any other backup not named Matt Cassel.Again, I’m not an advocate for Manziel, but Hoyer is garbage.....he’s reliable as long as he doesn’t play
Nah, man. They’re likely stuck with Hoyer for another year. He would actually cost the team about 600k if he’s cut. Also, no matter who they bring in, those players aren’t going to know the first thing about anything, let alone be able to run our offense as a backup. As you know, that’s not exactly a plug and play position.
Again, I’m not an advocate for Manziel, but Hoyer is garbage.....he’s reliable as long as he doesn’t play
Am I the only one who remembers that five or six game stretch with the Browns where Hoyer looked really good before going down with an injury?
Tebow is garbage. Hoyer is serviceable. We've had two franchise QBs back to back- which has skewed some people's perspective.
He might take the spot of the future Malcolm Butler or Jonathan Jones. We know what Manziel is at this point. Any UDFA seems more interesting to bring in than him.
Just a few years ago the off season rooster size was 75 or something. UDFAs still made an impact. Maybe back then you'd have a point. Now they pick guys they know they'll cut but someone has to play safety (or whatever). Could that player #89 or #90 have been a diamond in the rough? Yes. So could Manzel. That is why you kick the tires.
I agree from what I know about Manziel. I trust the guys who get paid to do so will learn more than me. Same goes for that player #91 whose place he takes. Oh, guys are not just Belichick. The scouts and positional coaches. Excuse me for thinking the guys that put together a team that usually goes around 12-4 might actually know a bit.