- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,906
- Reaction score
- 33,921
A high ranking NFLPA executive is the source and no NFLPA spokesperson has denied it. ESPN has been running this as the position of the NFLPA for days, if you can't see the difference between that and Cole's "unnamed source" that's your issue.
Furthermore there is absolutely no mention of this as an outstanding issue in any reporting taking place at the meetings, at least in terms of ESPN's coverage, however Spanky4050 may disagree, and he may have a Twitter source that trumps the actual coverage.
I think most people can see the difference. You can't. Coles' source may be no less valid, but by giving more of a description of the source might give away who it is. Say that Coles' source was Mankins' agent, what does he write "an unnamed agent who represents Logan Mankins" told him.











