- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,801
- Reaction score
- 20,475
We can all be very snide about PFF and Football Outsiders. I know I have been at times especially in the first years they came out, simply because so many of their raters where really not football people and so much of their rating was subjective.
But the fact is that these ratings services have their uses if you accept their limitations and take with a grain of salt any of their "final numbers" as gospel. What I like are their raw numbers to go along with the eye test. It is helpful to know that in the previous 3 games Butler hasn't been targeted much. It's equally interesting to know that he was targeted 13 times the other night and only gave up 7 catches. That is useful to know when you are making your own evaluations, even if 2 people looking at the same raw data might come up with 2 different conclusions.
Mazz (according to someone on the radio who thought he made an insightful conclusion) looked at that data and felt Butler was getting too much credit and giving up 7 catches including a TD showed just how far he needs to come before he becomes a big time CB.
That isn't exactly wrong but I see a much more positive viewing. Even though he is still being targeted more than #1 CB's usually are, he is making more plays that average CB's do. He has very rarely been burned in coverage. Zolack commented that he is being hurt by the fact he's a couple of inches shorter than ideal, and we have seen the number of times he's been literally an inch or two from making the big play as opposed to giving it up. He added that he can learn to make up for those inches with more experience, and pointed out he IS starting in just his 6th game on Sunday. Another key positive is that all this targeting is helping to show what a great tackler he already is right now.
So you can dismiss the PFF ratings if you want with righteous indignation and sarcasm. Some of it is funny. Their final number is merely a calculation of some raw data, and how it is weighed is just one man's estimation of what is important. But I think you'd be wasting an asset. Do I think Malcolm Butler is the top CB in the league? Of course not. But those raw numbers do help me as I try to figure out just how he is coming along in his first year as a starter.
JMHO
I think a lot of the people who are anti-PFF (like me) are generally pro-FO. Football Outsiders has its limitations, but at least it acknowledges what they are and doesn't pretend it's giving pure, objective, end-all measures. Sure, some people misinterpret them as such, but that's not on them.
PFF is just actively misleading, and that's pretty messed up. It represents its statistics as being something that they simply aren't. And the fact that they're so wrong so often sure doesn't help either. PFF is a very, very small part of a much larger argument at best. It's certainly not a conclusion, and it's ridiculed so much because that's how PFF represents its rankings, and that's how its adherents tend to represent it as well.











