- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 6,038
- Reaction score
- 4,157
I'm sure this isn't anything new for most of you, but I was thinking about what makes a championship team and how the Pats can try to achieve that status.
In a world of parity, the Pats do have some advantages......
1.) They have the best quarterback in the game WHO does not feel the need to be paid like the best quarterback in the game. His wife's unique financial situation and Brady's hunger for championships allow him to not occupy all of his team's salary cap.
2.) Because of a winning culture, the Pats are successful at getting success-starved vets to take deals that have team friendly terms.
But there is another group of players that are important to championship teams that the Pats are disadvantaged from the rest of the league: good players on rookie deals outplaying their salaries
1.) They are disadvantaged in that they are always picking from the bottom of the draft (which, yes, is a sign of your success).
2.) They are disadvantaged by the league for deflategate (a 2015 first round pick could have helped in the Super Bowl)
I look back and think it was more of a shame that the 2015 Pats didn't win as opposed to the 2017 pats. The 2015 Pats had great players on rookie deals like C.Jones, D.Hightower, J. Collins, and M.Butler. In the AFC Championship game the following 11 guys logged the most defensive snaps...
Secondary: D.McCourty, P.Chung, , M.Butler, L.Ryan, J.Coleman
Linebacker: D.Hightower, J.Collins
Defensive Line: J.Sheard, C.Jones, R.Ninkovich, M.Brown
That has the look of a championship D, but they lost to the corpse of Peyton Manning. Sure, a tough team was waiting the Super Bowl (I'm not one of those people who says, the Broncos beat the Panthers, since we beat the Broncos we would have beaten the Panthers, too), but this Pats team had championship-type roster. it's more of a shame that this team didn't win than the 2017 team.
In a world of parity, the Pats do have some advantages......
1.) They have the best quarterback in the game WHO does not feel the need to be paid like the best quarterback in the game. His wife's unique financial situation and Brady's hunger for championships allow him to not occupy all of his team's salary cap.
2.) Because of a winning culture, the Pats are successful at getting success-starved vets to take deals that have team friendly terms.
But there is another group of players that are important to championship teams that the Pats are disadvantaged from the rest of the league: good players on rookie deals outplaying their salaries
1.) They are disadvantaged in that they are always picking from the bottom of the draft (which, yes, is a sign of your success).
2.) They are disadvantaged by the league for deflategate (a 2015 first round pick could have helped in the Super Bowl)
I look back and think it was more of a shame that the 2015 Pats didn't win as opposed to the 2017 pats. The 2015 Pats had great players on rookie deals like C.Jones, D.Hightower, J. Collins, and M.Butler. In the AFC Championship game the following 11 guys logged the most defensive snaps...
Secondary: D.McCourty, P.Chung, , M.Butler, L.Ryan, J.Coleman
Linebacker: D.Hightower, J.Collins
Defensive Line: J.Sheard, C.Jones, R.Ninkovich, M.Brown
That has the look of a championship D, but they lost to the corpse of Peyton Manning. Sure, a tough team was waiting the Super Bowl (I'm not one of those people who says, the Broncos beat the Panthers, since we beat the Broncos we would have beaten the Panthers, too), but this Pats team had championship-type roster. it's more of a shame that this team didn't win than the 2017 team.