TheFlyingWedge
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 2,146
- Reaction score
- 2,612
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If Jimmy goes 4-0, I say you let him start over Brady in week 5 against Cleveland. Show case him and maybe hoax the Browns into doing something stupid. They have like 2 first and 2 seconds that would be awesome to get any combination of. Maybe a first and a switch of our (hopefully 32nd) with one of theirs (say, like their first from the Eagels)
Also, it probably wouldn't hurt to give Brady and extra week to get back in the swing of things, and not to mention, a extra week for rest probably won't hurt also. It also would allow him to start week 6 when hopefully a bunch of players will be coming of PuP.
Just my 2 cents!
Don't forget the 5-11 Browns beat us in Cleveland in 2010, one of our 2 losses in the regular season that year. And that was with Brady.
These games are not for trying to maximize draft picks or develop rookies or any of that ****. You play to win the game.
And Brady will be rusty after his time off. Do you really want him to sit, then throw him in cold against the Bengals, with @ Steelers, @ Bills after?
Actually, do you ever want to sit the GOAT if you don't have to? We've already lost 4 games of his brilliant career this season. I don't ever want to lose another.
I think one of the 49ers, Bears or Browns will end up picking top 3 and take DeShaun Watson.
Redskins might be an option if Cousins implodes this year.
Saints aren't realistic option since they just extended Brees/expect him to play at least 2 more years. They would then have to give up a likely 1st rounder AND pay Garoppolo big $.
Surprise option: Detroit Lions.
It boggles my mind that anyone would consider trading Brady while he is still the best player in football.
Since Goodell stole a 1st and a 4th from the Patriots, it's only fitting that Jimmy should net them a 1st and a 4th.
Absolutely, without a second thought. That's a top 10 (likely top 5) pick and a HOF, best-of-this-generation LT whose cap hit is a pretty reasonable $10M per year through 2018. He's cheaper than Solder, and quite a bit better. Even if Thomas is only 80% of himself by the end of the contract--which overstates his likely decline IMO--he'll still be easily worth it.
Add in the Rams as desperate. Their QB is complete ass.
Completely apples and oranges comparisons. Jimmy AND the team had 4 months to prepare for him playing in this game. Castle had about 2 minutes.I think you would agree that Jimmy played 10x better and was more impactful than Cassell did on that day vs KC.
Daftniks worship draft picks. It is all out to proportion to what they merit. Brady is 40. He will need to be replaced within three years. If you are lucky enough to have a qualified replacement you keep him ]. He is cheap for two more seasons and Brady is signed for 3 more years at a high price. Who is to say that the Pats will not need a sub QB for an injury or that ta Brady will be worth his salary in three years?It boggles my mind that so many people here have consigned Garoppolo to trade bait. This player could be worth more to the Patriots than a draft pick or two as an important contributor for years to come.
Completely apples and oranges comparisons. Jimmy AND the team had 4 months to prepare for him playing in this game. Castle had about 2 minutes.
Only now, not in a year or two.Brady counts for 23 MILLION in dead money if cut or traded
| 21 | 761 |
| 222 | 25K |
| 6 | 3K |
| 10 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 2 - June 17 (Through 26yrs)











