- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,681
- Reaction score
- 23,359
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah, to give up the 2nd I think they're already pretty sure he's the long-term answer for them. But 8 games to make sure that's the case can't be a bad thing, if only because it helps you make sure you aren't getting into another Brock Osweiler fiasco. Which they aren't, and I would think anyone who watched them both play understands that, but I still get the value of making the trade now. Plus they can tag him now.You don't send away top 2nd rounder for tryout. They wanted him as their franchise QB before draft and since they didn't draft QB probably believed they can get him.
Several people.Who thought that?
haha hilarious. im confident Brisket wins more game rest of season then JimmayNot after they win half of their remaining games with a real QB.
BACKUP OPTIONS
1) Hoyer
2) Kaepernick
3) trade a lower pick for someone else.
=====
BTW, we can now start guessing about tomorrow's trade.
Just seems odd we have a 40 year old QB and traded a future starter when he was considered the successor. Only logical thing I can think of is them loading up for something big
It makes no sense that they did not trade him in the offseason now.
This team is going nowhere without Brady. I could be the backup.I absolutely hate this move. Not because I thought Jimmy would be the heir, but because we have no backup in the middle of the season, which is the worst time to acquire a new quarterback and make him ready for game action. This is horrible for depth, which BB usually cares about.
Timing was wrong for Jimmy. Brady is playing like an MVP still. Just draft another one.This is bull ****. If you have a true successor, which we did, you pay them both and deal with it.
Several people.