37Harrison
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,800
- Reaction score
- 317
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.not only can we win, we should beat these clowns. They have Tom Brady and a bunch of high schoolers!! Every time i think about the fact that we lost by 42 to these ****suckers I just wanna throw up. Beside Brady I can't think of one player on their team worth mentioning. Who is their running back? Ben Jarvus Green Ellis?? Danny ****** Woodhead? Goddamn Wes Welker the scrawny piece of **** that he is is a threat? 45 year old deion branch we cant stop him? A couple of rookie tight ends?? Fernandez or Hernandez or Martiniez or whatever the **** is name is and Gronkowski? What about their defense?? Goddamn rookies left and right! Honestly the only way the Jets dont win this game is if they played like a bunch of scared ****ies like last time, because its all mental. The jets are way more ****** talented, but they were a bunch vadges in that MNF game from the word goddamn go. Now let's start believing were better than these ****less chowderheads, and we'll win the ****** game!
Talent is used for acting, so let's draw up a good analogy.
Sanchez vs. Brady is like Stephen Spielberg versus me. You could give Stephen Spielberg a bunch of soap opera actors, crappy editors and cameramen, a pretty bad script, and throw in some third-rate music. You could then give me Russell Crowe, Edward Norton, a great script, all the best producers, a John Williams score, and basically everything else.
Spielberg makes a much better movie than I do.
Same is true about Brady and Sanchez. If you don't have the right director, all of your talent doesn't really amount to much.
I'll take your inane Jetsfan rant and raise you a:
This Pats team is not THAT good!! - TheGangGreen.com Message Board
Talent is used for acting, so let's draw up a good analogy.
Sanchez vs. Brady is like Stephen Spielberg versus me. You could give Stephen Spielberg a bunch of soap opera actors, crappy editors and cameramen, a pretty bad script, and throw in some third-rate music. You could then give me Russell Crowe, Edward Norton, a great script, all the best producers, a John Williams score, and basically everything else.
Spielberg makes a much better movie than I do.
Same is true about Brady and Sanchez. If you don't have the right director, all of your talent doesn't really amount to much.
Let's break it down.
Offense:
LT - Ferguson/Light Even
C - Mangold slight edge over Koppen
I don't think people realize how great Brady is.
Only two that are worth a debate.
Ferguson is outstanding
Mangold may be a wider edge over Kop.
A statistic to ponder while considering offensive line play:Only two that are worth a debate.
Ferguson is outstanding
Mangold may be a wider edge over Kop.
Agree. Dude had his homer glasses on.
A statistic to ponder while considering offensive line play:
NY Jets - 28 Sacks Allowed/525 passing attempts
NE Patriots - 25 Sacks Allowed/507 passing attempts
Only two that are worth a debate.
Ferguson is outstanding
Mangold may be a wider edge over Kop.
Brandon Moore is not better than Stephen Neal. No way, no how!Maybe Moore over Connolly but not on KR.
Stephen Neal = Brandon MooreLight's better than Ferguson
I'd break down the O-line like this:
Light > Ferguson
Mankins > Slauson
Mangold > Koppen
Moore > Connolly/Wendell
Vollmer > Hunter