Give Kraft A Hand
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
- Messages
- 947
- Reaction score
- 1,129
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.A drafted qb won't play and win this year. They may draft a guy like Mond and see how it goes or just wait for Jimmy to be cut next year.We need a QB. We aren’t winning without one. Everything is a risk. Taking no risk will have us sitting on the worst QB room in the nfl wallowing in mediocrity, patting ourselves on the back about keeping picks that can win because if the QB
Fields would be starting by October. And this team has been built in a way that it surely can win with a young QBA drafted qb won't play and win this year. They may draft a guy like Mond and see how it goes or just wait for Jimmy to be cut next year.
Every single thought you have on our QB situation is exactly how I feel too. I was going to post in this thread but no need. You got it covered.Fields would be starting by October. And this team has been built in a way that it surely can win with a young QB
Jimmy isn’t the answer unless the question is who can we get that will disappoint us with his inability to stay healthy.
“See how it goes” is a terrible plan for the most important position in the game when you are the worst in the league at it.
You have to take risk or you are just accepting mediocrity until you get lucky.
I hope he is still available at 15.If we stay at 15 I hope we take Parsons.
Im not a big college football guy but what I heard is 2022 qb class is worse.I probably have not looked at all the pros's and cons but if we do not take a QB this year are we only kicking the can down the road into 2022 and will be in the same position of other teams wanting a QB or a back up QB. Are the QB's on offer this year better than 2022.
This is the year to take a QB. Next year's class will be much weaker.I probably have not looked at all the pros's and cons but if we do not take a QB this year are we only kicking the can down the road into 2022 and will be in the same position of other teams wanting a QB or a back up QB. Are the QB's on offer this year better than 2022.
An awesome scenario but as close to zero chance of happening as there is. There are QB needy teams likely to leapfrog the Pats via trade before Lance makes it to 15. Garoppolo has a no trade clause and set to cost over $48 for the next two seasons. Not affordable for the Pats as it stands. He would need to agree to restructure his deal, perhaps for more guaranteed money. But now you’re committing more money on the cap long term to a QB that isn’t even in the long term plans since you already have Lance for that. That’s assuming he’d even agree to taking a paycut. That’s on top of joining the locker room with a pissed off alpha male in Cam Newton who is trying to prove he can still be a starter in the NFL and hasn’t had to be anyone’s backup since his sophomore year at Florida 13 years ago.Say, hypothetically, Lance falls to 15. Its plausible. I think Denver would take Fields over Lance at 9.. Lance is the riskiest of the top 5 qbs by far. I wouldn't trade up for him. But if hes there at 15,I think BB gets
him. Lets say Jimmy G is gettable for a 2022 2nd. I think BB does that in a heartbeat. Stidham gets cut, JG starts and Cam is the backup. Lance needs at least a year on the bench and JG and Cam are two great guys to learn from.
To me, ideal scenario. Pats are instant contenders but have hope for the future with Lance and a solid backup in Cam when JG gets hurt. And gave up virtually no draft capital. Not likely but its plausible
Disagree.An awesome scenario but as close to zero chance of happening as there is. There are QB needy teams likely to leapfrog the Pats via trade before Lance makes it to 15. Garoppolo has a no trade clause and set to cost over $48 for the next two seasons. Not affordable for the Pats as it stands. He would need to agree to restructure his deal, perhaps for more guaranteed money. But now you’re committing more money on the cap long term to a QB that isn’t even in the long term plans since you already have Lance for that. That’s assuming he’d even agree to taking a paycut. That’s on top of joining the locker room with a pissed off alpha male in Cam Newton who is trying to prove he can still be a starter in the NFL and hasn’t had to be anyone’s backup since his sophomore year at Florida 13 years ago.
The way I see it is this. If the Pats trade for Garoppolo, then they are out on investing a first rounder on a rookie QB, and Cam would have to go. We’d be more likely to see a developmental backup taken in the 3rd or 4th round, a guy who would push Stidham for his spot. The first rounder would be used on a stud defensive player.
If they see an opportunity to get Lance without having to give up as much (or in this scenario, anything), then there’s no trading for Garoppolo. Cam would start and help mentor Lance to get him ready for the role.
You don’t know that. Cam hasn’t given any indication that he would accept a backup role. This is what he said prior to re-signing with the Pats:Of course it would be open comp between him and Cam. Cam would have
no prob with that.
Pats can afford him. And they may only keep him one year anyway.
You talk in absolutes and are so definite about a process that is knowingly hit and miss. If we draft Fields and IF he develops he may potentially be starting as early as OctoberFields would be starting by October. And this team has been built in a way that it surely can win with a young QB
Jimmy isn’t the answer unless the question is who can we get that will disappoint us with his inability to stay healthy.
“See how it goes” is a terrible plan for the most important position in the game when you are the worst in the league at it.
You have to take risk or you are just accepting mediocrity until you get lucky.
yup. Gets only harder from here to secure a franchise QB.This is the year to take a QB. Next year's class will be much weaker.
I don't necessarily agree. Sure, right now, there are only maybe two QB's in next year's class that would be 1st rounders this year, but there's a lot more depth at the position next year. And a QB often comes from nowhere to be a high pick, like Zack Wilson, Joe Burrow or Mac Jones.This is the year to take a QB. Next year's class will be much weaker.