- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 28,161
- Reaction score
- 7,435
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's a UFA after this year. He's gone IMO, unless Belichick likes him more than I do I can't see him putting big money into him. Not to suggest he would cut him, not at all, but he'll get bigger $$$ elsewhere.
He'd cost about $6.5M to Franchise and I don't see that either.
Belichick often drafts a year ahead. Solder to replace Light. Ridley/Vereen to replace BJGE.Then the question is, who replaces him?
Belichick often drafts a year ahead. Solder to replace Light. Ridley/Vereen to replace BJGE.
Wilson likely to replace Chung. It is what it is.
Is't Wilson more of a cover safety? If that is the case, we have booth Gregory and Wilson back there, booth out of the box cover safeties.
He's been even worse than Chung.i like gregory..for now
I really liked this kid coming out..but lately..he just flat out sucks....
Chung has had some good moments, he helped with the re-invigoration of the defense at the end of last year (though in hindsight, maybe that was mostly Spikes). But his play this season so far has been uninspiring at best, and unfortunately, the body of work isn't there to justify him being around past this season.
I wish we could've landed Delmas. I was always on that bandwagon. I wonder where the team had him ranked.
If Chung leaves next year, it will be because someone overpaid him, and not because he sucks. What exactly was so bad about his game Sunday? He didn't make a play on Chandler for the touchdown, but we already knew he's not an Ed Reed type of cover safety. He's a more traditional, in the box, "small" linebacker type of safety. I think if Wilson can develop into a good cover guy (or we bring someone else in who is), Chung is just fine for what he is.
It reminds me of someone like Ninkovich. If he's your best defensive end, you're probably not doing well. But if he's your solid vet opposite a stud like we think Jones can be, he's a real good option. Same with Chung IMO. If we can get a good cover safety, be it Wilson, Gregory rebounding, or someone else coming in later, Chung is more than adequate as the other safety.
Patrick Chung the new target, as the safeties come under attack by the instant experts who need to be constantly on the attack.
Why is it that when the Pats complete a pass its because we have a great QB, elite receivers and exceptional schemes, yet when any team completes a pass against us, its because our secondary sucks and our guys should be replaced.
For certain angry sad, and spoiled Pats fans. In an age where 300 yd games are common, 60% completion rates are minimum requirements (except if you are Mark Sanchez ) and the rules are stacked against defenders: it has become clear that ANY completion made by an opponent HAS to be the result of gross malfeasance some Patriot defensive back. Can't be any other reason.....and "off with their heads"
Patrick Chung the new target, as the safeties come under attack by the instant experts who need to be constantly on the attack.
Why is it that when the Pats complete a pass its because we have a great QB, elite receivers and exceptional schemes, yet when any team completes a pass against us, its because our secondary sucks and our guys should be replaced.
For certain angry sad, and spoiled Pats fans. In an age where 300 yd games are common, 60% completion rates are minimum requirements (except if you are Mark Sanchez ) and the rules are stacked against defenders: it has become clear that ANY completion made by an opponent HAS to be the result of gross malfeasance some Patriot defensive back. Can't be any other reason.....and "off with their heads"