- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 35,860
- Reaction score
- 29,652
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Might wanna look that up my friend….Starting 0-4 is fine. Going 0-17 isn’t. I think we started 0-4 a few times with Brady even so no biggie…
I think we started 0-4 a few times with Brady even so no biggie…
No, Brady amazingly never started worse than 0-1. 0-4 is really reserved for the very worst teams. The team has only started 0-4 7 times in its history - 1965, 1969, 1975, 1981, 1992, 1993, and 2000.Starting 0-4 is fine. Going 0-17 isn’t. I think we started 0-4 a few times with Brady even so no biggie…
We never started 0-4 with BradyStarting 0-4 is fine. Going 0-17 isn’t. I think we started 0-4 a few times with Brady even so no biggie…
Im surprised no one seems upset that we are going into a season where that is the most likely scenario.Can’t see how I’d be disappointed with the most likely scenario.
Didn't we start 1-3 for three years straight with the immortal Mac Jones?We never started 0-4 with Brady
As long as the Jest screw up!Personally, I'll be fine with us starting 0-4 or 1-3 In Bill used talk about as the extension of the preseason.
As we did for camp, we might consider what we would like to see when Brady comes to town to announce the MIA game, other no serious injuries. BTW, I think the PUP players plus Barmore and Mapu are allowed to start practicing before the MIA game.
=======================
I would like to see
1) no serious injuries
1) an OL that has started together for at least a couple of weeks. At minimum I would like to see 4 of the positions settled at least for awhile.
2) And yes, I would like to see Maye as QB by then.
3) I will be interested to see who is getting most reps as the 4th corner, and
4) how the new additions are working out
I think it's a forgone conclusion that we are expecting to be win less out the gate.Personally, I'll be fine with us starting 0-4 or 1-3 In Bill used talk about as the extension of the preseason.
As we did for camp, we might consider what we would like to see when Brady comes to town to announce the MIA game, other no serious injuries. BTW, I think the PUP players plus Barmore and Mapu are allowed to start practicing before the MIA game.
=======================
I would like to see
1) no serious injuries
1) an OL that has started together for at least a couple of weeks. At minimum I would like to see 4 of the positions settled at least for awhile.
2) And yes, I would like to see Maye as QB by then.
3) I will be interested to see who is getting most reps as the 4th corner, and
4) how the new additions are working out
Why?Im surprised no one seems upset that we are going into a season where that is the most likely scenario.
So you expect that those changes are supposed to make the team worse?Why?
The Pats only have:
New Head Coach who never has held the position.
New coaching staff
New OC
New offensive scheme
New GM
New QB 1
New QB 2
3 of the most important positions of an NFL franchise have changed - GM,HC and QB.
To be a trap game, there has to be a game we are favore in that we could lose. Is there a game you think Vegas should favor the Patriots in on their schedule? The Cardinals and Titans are the only games I really think you could feel good about the Pats chances.Well on 2nd thought ... will we have any trap game wins?
| 60 | 15K |
| 2K | 92K |
| 333 | 9K |
| 8 | 470 |
| 734 | 20K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











