patsfaninpa
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 5,886
- Reaction score
- 2,046
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Who had Jermaine Eluemunor still in the NFL and making 3/39m after we let him go?
If Eluemunor is as good as that, he was great find. We needed a backup OG. Securing one that is a potential starter in 2020 is gravy.
You gave an interesting nickname to Jermaine.
I'd guess he makes the 53.
Who had Jermaine Eluemunor still in the NFL and making 3/39m after we let him go?
If Eluemunor is as good as that, he was great find. We needed a backup OG. Securing one that is a potential starter in 2020 is gravy.
You gave an interesting nickname to Jermaine.
Yeah I think Jermaine and Froholdt have starter potential at G in 2020. I love Thuney but he's going to command top G dollar as been mentioned many times. Of course Cannon is not getting any younger...I hope Cajuste can play a little later this season. We need to know how well he can play T before the next draft.
I was off a bit at the whole Guard thing but they both have been productive at their current positions
Bryant is last year’s Crownover, you’re just enamored with the shiny new toy. Marcus has been in a pro system and weight room for a year. We’ll see if he’s been working and getting stronger.Ahead of Crownover, ass-uming just 2 backup OTs on the 53? I certainly hope not. That would mean that Crownover didn't come close to taking advantage of the very real opportunity he has here. And as a top-125 talent, that would be a damn shame.
Jellybean can hang around the PS for awhile. Far more befitting of his talent.
And Munford was a veteran, while Bryant was a rookie.Or, the team went with the player that Josh McDaniels had coached previously in Munford. The guy who had experience playing multiple O-line positions as well as being the 6th O-lineman/Blocking TE. Areas that Bryant may not have had experience with. And the Pats wanted Bryant to focus on learning the tackle position instead of complicating things.
The team needs to determine whether Bryant or Crownover has the most upside. As they did with Wallace, this player is for the future, not 2026. He doesn't even need to be active.Bryant is last year’s Crownover, you’re just enamored with the shiny new toy. Marcus has been in a pro system and weight room for a year. We’ll see if he’s been working and getting stronger.
I like Crownover’s tools, but he likely needs some development.
Competition will sort it out, as it always does.The team needs to determine whether Bryant or Crownover has the most upside. As they did with Wallace, this player is for the future, not 2026. He doesn't even need to be active.
Lomu will likely be the main backup at any tackle or guard position.Lumo will be the backup RT.
I don’t see it. Marrone showed he likes continuity on his line, he didn’t even like guys swapping sides if he could help it. I suspect one of Bryant or Crownover will make the roster, I’m givng Bryant the edge for now based on experience.I suspect that AVT is a better option that either Bryant or Crownover at RT if there is an emergency need during the season at RT.
Agreed.Give it a couple of months. It will all be sorted out. But, for sure, Bryant has shown value.
Through the regular season, Will Campbell did not grade out too badly:
Will Campbell has a legitimate length issue. He's not the first, won't be the last...
Incorrect. It's not "historically the worst". It's the "shortest" wingspan of an OT since they started documenting Wingspan in 2013. But, the results until he was injured showed a kid who's wingspan wasn't a glaring issue. Not that facts have EVER mattered to you.Correct. But his issue is historically the Worst.
And to state the obvious flip-side, it's not like we won't see him in action at LT, if he is "getting it" at all. A long season in the trenches will unfortunately often give us a look at multiple guys, even with a standard philosophy of one man, one position. We're apparently going heavy on the idea of improved versatility and interchangeability (if that's a word.) I don't think the idea is to swap people out willy nilly but Vrable has emphasized it from the podium -- it's another way to confront the expected injury bug rather than complain of being snake-bitten if the bug gets us. So we'll likely see some Lomu Emu at LT at some point, and more importantly, he'll get those chances to step in at the LT position. (Everybody shut up when we see him at LT during the preseason... it would take a lot to just steal away the position during the vanilla-D training camp portion of the program.) And of course, I'm also ready to eat my words. We don't know where our coaching staff is on Campbell. For all we know they sit around Foxborough saying, "You know I keep thinking about what that State guy says on patsfans.com. his arms are short."I was a guy who always felt that Matt Light would have excelled at LG, however for the Pats he was MORE valuable as a solid LT than an exceptional LG. That's the thing. All this talk about moving Campbell is simply stupid for THIS year at least. Lomu is coming into the league with a defined role to fill. He is NOT a finished product. He lacks functional strength and experience to excel immediately as an LT or even a RT in his rookie year. He DOES have a chance to excel as the swing T since he has the POTENTIAL to become an outstanding OT in a year or two.
I keep pointing out that rookies make mistakes and have big hurdles to overcome in their first year. Why waste a full year of experience that Campbell accrued only to see similar mistakes be made by the LAST OT taken in the first round, not the first. It would be detrimental for the team to put Lomu at LT this year and move Will to LG (a position he has never played) It Makes NO sense. What do you do with ATV. It is not your best use of your existing talent. You want to revisit NEXT season, be my guest, but for THIS season. Will Campbell should be our LT.
The correct strategy is to give Campbell a full season to see if he has improved his game and gained from his experiences of last season. Rookies do NOT end up being the same players they were as rookies. There IS value in the snaps they took over their first years, and they often improve, sometimes a lot, sometimes a little. Don't throw that away on the false whim that Lomu is a better LT than Will Campbell without ever putting on pads as a Patriot.
| 70 | 5K |
| 668 | 59K |
| 172 | 22K |
| 17 | 510 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 13 - June 28 (Through 26yrs)











