- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,620
- Reaction score
- 16,404
No way in hell. Not at $12m
BTW, what stars have played their last couple of years for the pats for greatly reduced compensation?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No way in hell. Not at $12m
He's still looking pretty good in NO (no knock on Gronk, whom I love. I just wish he could get and stay healthy).So now Ben Watson may play later into this decade than Gronk?
Fine with me
I love Gronk, but he looked slow when he played, and that's been infrequent. I'll miss his what he used to bring to the team
He's a legend, but honestly he can't stay on the field. Hard to justify giving him the contract he's looking for when you know he's going to miss 2+ games a year at a minimum, and is one bad hit away from IR.
The only way gronk is going to be paid at the top end of the TE market here is if it's all incentive based for a 16 game season, and he's got that now and he doesn't like it.
Agree. I'm certain they did. Rosenhaus knows what he is doing. He wanted one more payday.
Its clear to me the $3m in incentives was a bone thrown in Gronk's direction in lieu of a contract extension.
I hope he does retire. TE is too important of a position to a qb like Brady to have an unreliable player at the position. Nevermind the "next guy" at qb, they need to get the current guy at qb the "next guy" at TE cuz Krafty Bob traded the "next guy" at qb for a box of footballs and some pinnies when he committed to the current guy at qb
I hope he does retire. TE is too important of a position to a qb like Brady to have an unreliable player at the position. Nevermind the "next guy" at qb, they need to get the current guy at qb the "next guy" at TE cuz Krafty Bob traded the "next guy" at qb for a box of footballs and some pinnies when he committed to the current guy at qb
If you let 180 lb cornerbacks rip the ball from you in the end zone, you're likely to stay healthy.He's still looking pretty good in NO (no knock on Gronk, whom I love. I just wish he could get and stay healthy).
The games played, snap % #s work Gronkowski are missing. He has several games a year with "managed" snaps and doesn't run certain routes (like the effective seam route that's been missing this season). Time to cut bait and get someone who plays 16/16...
No question.Is Gronk a hall of famer? First ballot?? He doesn't have the longevity.
Enough of this "relapse" BS. This puerile negativity belongs on the Jetes MB ( and similar forums).The bigger question is, what has a higher probability of happening. Gronk going to IR, or Josh Gordon Relapsing?!
That is the literal “million dollar question”
I think it’s a very valid concern. The guy has screwed up multiple times and already may or may not have had a minor screwup here.Enough of this "relapse" BS. This puerile negativity belongs on the Jetes MB ( and similar forums).
The games played, snap % #s work Gronkowski are missing. He has several games a year with "managed" snaps and doesn't run certain routes (like the effective seam route that's been missing this season). Time to cut bait and get someone who plays 16/16...