- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,811
- Reaction score
- 21,911
The difference is one of perspective.
Of course, our starting 5 are one of the best secondaries in the NFL.
Good depth means being able to handle one injury in a unit. Great depth means able to handle two injuries.
Foe example, in he past few years, we have need to deal with 2 injuries in the OL and at LB.
=====
So, how we at safety if we lose even ONE of our top 3? All three get lots and lots of reps. Are we ready to depend on anyone else.
OK, let's look at corner, our strength, as everyone says. We have two starter types from last year, and we have a STer from last year, and a new STer. Do we have great depth? good depth?
Of course, our starting 5 are one of the best secondaries in the NFL.
Good depth means being able to handle one injury in a unit. Great depth means able to handle two injuries.
Foe example, in he past few years, we have need to deal with 2 injuries in the OL and at LB.
=====
So, how we at safety if we lose even ONE of our top 3? All three get lots and lots of reps. Are we ready to depend on anyone else.
OK, let's look at corner, our strength, as everyone says. We have two starter types from last year, and we have a STer from last year, and a new STer. Do we have great depth? good depth?
And I am talking about people who can cover at a high level, including McCourty and Harmon.
CB depth is pretty low on the list of 'issues'. You have three who any other team in the NFL would be thrilled to have.












