PATRIOTS NEWS Explosive New Hernandez Details

[belichick010405]

Poster A posts an article indicating that a representative from the Attleboro DC indicated that an arrest warrant has been drawn up but not acted upon by the court . . .

Poster B posts an article indicating that a representative from the Attleboro DC indicated that no such arrest warrant application exists . . .

Poster B calls Poster A a troll and goes on to say that his article is 100% correct . ..

I merely join the conversation and inquire from Poster B how can one claim his media source is 100% correct and the formers is not . . . I then mention a logical point that I personally would feel a lot more comfortable if I heard from the horse's mouth, given there is conflicting accounts of what was claimed by the court personnel . . .

Poster B does not address my question and mere responds by reposting his article . . .

Okay I get it now . . . thanks for playing . . . your name fits your posts nicely . . .

It is borderline ridiculous Yehoodi and you are spot on with that analysis.

 

[Jackson 2]

Well lets hope that some of the others heed that advice when attempting to have a salient discussion without the garbage that Joker, Off The Grid, Andy Johnson, Jackson, and a number of others of which includes the resident-know-it-all Deus continue on with and think they are entitled to when it comes to any topic on these boards.

Holy ****, Daddy - I made the VARSITY!!! Coach just said so!!!

 

[Joker]

Poster A posts an article indicating that a representative from the Attleboro DC indicated that an arrest warrant has been drawn up but not acted upon by the court . . . ..produce it in print ...I want to see the NAME of the DC representative you claim made a public statement to that effect....I'll wait...


Poster B posts an article indicating that a representative from the Attleboro DC indicated that no such arrest warrant application exists . . ..produced it in print annotated...you have a problem with THIS?

Poster B calls Poster A a troll and goes on to say that his article is 100% correct . .. MY article???..where do you crazed haters get this stuff from? It's a public news conference on the record...an event that was recorded publicly...you're making it out to be hearsay, like the "representative" you say exists that made your statement

I merely join the conversation stop patronizing me and the rest of the board.You KNOW exactly why you joined the conversation and so does everyone who's read your posts today and inquire from Poster B how can one claim his media source is 100% correct and the formers is not uh..because the public statement was made in public by the public officials involved?? yes?? you don't like THAT explanation?..BTW, cite the identity and link the press conference from the "official" you refer to in your A statement...I'll wait. . . I then mention a logical point that I personally would feel a lot more comfortable if I heard from the horse's mouth, given there is conflicting accounts of what was claimed by the court personnel by the media . . . the two officials from the Clerk of Court giving a public, recorded in person statement is NOT the horse's mouth? OK...well, then, if THAT is the parameter, then there is NO ONE that can satisfy your requirements.

Poster B does not address my question and mere responds by reposting his article . . . what question?..the one that you would only believe there was a public appearance by two officials from the Clerk of Court if you saw a VIDEO?....that's ludicrous...why do media scribes even exist then?...there's more to your bubbling, roiling, beneath the surface anger...

Okay I get it now . . . thanks for playing . . . your name fits your posts nicely . . . all you have is a thinly veiled personal attack?

There is an ignore function here. Use it if it pains you when anyone disagrees with your narrow, stilted viewpoints..I mean, I merely wanted to add that.

 

[jsull87]

You seem to really like Pom Poms

 

[BradyFTW!]

Why should I say something to another poster about something that doesn't involve me and I don't care about? I'm not his buddy, we agree in this thread about a lot but we've disagreed about other stuff in other threads, I dunno, I don't keep track and I don't hold grudges and I certainly don't tell people not to post in respond to me ever again because that's childish.

When I'm tired of arguing with someone I stop replying to them and move on because this is just a discussion board about football nothing that happens here matters.

What a stupid opinion. Never mention or respond to me again.

 

[Deus Irae]

I see you did not understand my point regarding the word "parties" , well I actually said the "parties in question" . . . my post was at the end of series of posts between BSR and myself and in which I was not talking about the "parties" insofar as defendant and commonwealth are concerned, but the parties involved with the warrant process, seeking, approval, issuance and service of the same . . . I understand where you were coming from saw the word parties and thought I meant the DA and the defendant . . . understandable as, if you are like myself, don't have the time to read every post in the thread, and get things in context, especially one with 275+ pages . . . . . .

My sincere apologies if I misread and, therefore, got the point wrong. I think we can all agree that we'd like to be coming from a 100% certain knowledge position, and I think we can all agree that we aren't. Beyond that, let's all agree that the Jets suck, and I think that will give us all a strong foundation to move forward as Brothers (fans) in arms, as it were.

 

[Joker]

You seem to really like Pom Poms

my grandkids do...looks like I 'll have to take them away...God forbid these people who hate Patriot fans find out anybody dares to wave pom poms and cheer their team on, like their sisters and moms and grandmothers have done for decades.

 

[Deus Irae]

Holy ****, Daddy - I made the VARSITY!!! Coach just said so!!!

Wait... why am I mentioned in that dude's post (I see it in your quote)? I've got him on ignore and have had him there since our discussion some days ago.

 

[Joker]

Wait... why am I mentioned in that dude's post (I see it in your quote)? I've got him on ignore and have had him there since our discussion some days ago.

It must be the end times...he groups ME with YOU...probably the two most polar posters on this board. FWIW I think you have hit the ball out of the park every time you've stepped to the plate in this thread.

 

[Jackson 2]

Wait... why am I mentioned in that dude's post (I see it in your quote)? I've got him on ignore and have had him there since our discussion some days ago.

Hey, I can get into enough trouble on my own. If you think I'm going to bring on more trouble by answering public questions from the likes of you...well, you've got another think coming, sonny (as my mother used to say)!

 

[Patjew]

Wait... why am I mentioned in that dude's post (I see it in your quote)? I've got him on ignore and have had him there since our discussion some days ago.

That guy makes me miss maverick4.

 

[Deus Irae]

It must be the end times...he groups ME with YOU...probably the two most polar posters on this board. FWIW I think you have hit the ball out of the park every time you've stepped to the plate in this thread.

He's got a couple of decent pairings (Andy/Me) (OTG/You), but trying to mash the pairings into a foursome is definitely an odd fit.

And thank you for thinking that second part. I appreciate it.

Hey, I can get into enough trouble on my own. If you think I'm going to bring on more trouble by answering public questions from the likes of you...well, you've got another think coming, sonny (as my mother used to say)!

:thumb:

I wasn't trying to get you in trouble. I just found it weird to see my name included after seeing the post of his that Fnord had quoted which had him telling Andy not to respond to him anymore. It seemed a bit hypocritical.

Again, though, not trying to get you in trouble.

 

[Rob0729]

That guy makes me miss maverick4.

Maverick4 is still here posing as another screen name that escapes me at this time. So you should be excited that we can hear criticism of McKid all year long.

But good one BTW.

 

[Jackson 2]

That guy makes me miss maverick4.

Thanks! I'm laughing so hard I'm crying - and I'm serious ...

 

[jah]

Has this thread been derailed into a pissing contest already? We don't even know what'll happen to Hernandez yet.

 

[Bruins29]

Has this thread been derailed into a pissing contest already? We don't even know what'll happen to Hernandez yet.

Ahhh it was a pissing contest after the first few pages. We are 244 pages in lol

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

Has this thread been derailed into a pissing contest already? We don't even know what'll happen to Hernandez yet.

We don't care about Hernandez anymore!

There are important arguments to be won on the Interwebs!

 

[Jackson 2]

Has this thread been derailed into a pissing contest already? We don't even know what'll happen to Hernandez yet.

Who's Hernandez?

 

[Joker]

yeah...well...I must admit, I never thought my other life as a pom pommer(that's me in the foreground) in drag would ever be found out...today has been fraught with emotion for me but I'm finally glad to be free of my shame...yes, I'm a pom pommer and proud to be a waver of the poms with the rest of the girls who, until today, only knew me as "Josey"....

 

[nowayback]

Lets not forget, with these lawyers AH has, that it might have to do with the civil suit in Fla. too.