- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 73,419
- Reaction score
- 116,131
King? Can't Bob use someone else as his mouthpiece?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I was saying “you” as in posters in general.I don’t run anything here, but I do have the right to my opinion. I haven’t asked for any threads to be closed but I have said some should be moved to the appropriate forum. Political posts belong in the political forum, and threads about players who aren’t on the Patriots or aren’t going to be facing them belong in the NFL Forum. And while I don’t make any decision on them I or any other person here can recommend it.
The best evidence to cite in support of your view is that BB waited until the last possible minute to make the deal. Following your line of thought, he saw for himself that Brady had played at a very high level for eight weeks/half the season; the Pats' bye just happened to coincide with the timing of the Trade Deadline. Brady had given him no reason to jump to the conclusion that he wouldn't be playing at a high level next season. Given the cap constraints, the deal had to be done. That's a neat and tidy argument.This is far as I'll go with speculating what BB was thinking..
I do believe, from a long term planning perspective he wanted a reason to start Jimmy and move on from Tom. It had nothing to do with AG.
The reality of the situation is his 40 year old QB is still playing at a ridiculously high level and his demise cannot be projected at this time. Additionally, he is financially attractive and most importantly gives this team, and not Jimmy a better chance to win a SB this year and in 2018.
This whole sh*tstorm can best be summed up by
a quote from The Crown of a Life it was written by Isa Blagden:
>>>>If a lie is only printed often enough, it becomes a quasi-truth, and if such a truth is repeated often enough, it becomes an article of belief, a dogma, and men will die for it.<<<<<<<
Wickersham, often working with fellow ESPN investigative reporter Don Van Natta, has an excellent history of NFL reporting, including stories about the Jerry Jones/Roger Goodell rift, the long Super Bowl hangover inside the Seattle Seahawks, and about the moves of the Rams and Chargers to Los Angeles and the Raiders to Las Vegas. Those stories, with the benefit of history, have largely been shown to be accurate.
I know this is Kraft's side of the story. But no way he says anything that would exacerbate the situation.
So my biggest take away is that it's interesting that BB is seeking Kraft's opinion on a Jimmy trade. Because the media would have you believe BB would quit if Kraft meddled with Brady. How dare the owner have a say on the people he employs. We'll actually BB checks with him regarding the back up QB so obviously he knows Kraft will have input on Brady.
Story over.
Heard Seth again..for a bit...its always I think, I believe, could be.... Just like the piece it verifies what I think, its mostly speculation . He basically gathered all the theories and some fact from last months and came up with a conclusion .
Closed for now
Open and let's stay on topic please.
Here's Adam Schefter (warning - ESPN video) refuting the Belichick to the Giants rumors. No sources other than his contract though, just logic.
Here's Adam Schefter (warning - ESPN video) refuting the Belichick to the Giants rumors. No sources other than his contract though, just logic.
So my biggest take away is that it's interesting that BB is seeking Kraft's opinion on a Jimmy trade. Because the media would have you believe BB would quit if Kraft meddled with Brady. How dare the owner have a say on the people he employs. We'll actually BB checks with him regarding the back up QB so obviously he knows Kraft will have input on Brady.
| 62 | 13K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











