- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,775
- Reaction score
- 38,038
Let's clarify something. No one has ever questioned Mallett's work ethic or football IQ.
Yea, much better to have a punk than a dummie.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Let's clarify something. No one has ever questioned Mallett's work ethic or football IQ.
For Vikings fans. I was looking forward to sending him some more crap for draft picks in the future
Don't worry, nothing has changed. They drafted Ponder. I rest my case.
Good call.
I'm still in shock about the Jake Locker pick that I haven't moved on to being shocked by the Ponder pick.
Mallett chose Michigan first because it presented the path of least resistance to an NFL career. The opposite reason to Brady making that choice, a shot to compete against and prove he could hang with the best. Tom fought through resistance and adversity at every level and emerged as a HOF NFL QB as a result. At the first sign of adversity in Michigan, Mallett bailed to another path of least resistance. But just for good measure he managed to screw up on arrival at both locations. His rocket arm and competitive coaching being what it is in the NCAA, he lived to play another day. He won't get anywhere near that kind of leeway here. He will be pushed and prodded and berated for his myriad shortcomings mercilessly and unless he's suddenly done a 180 character wise it won't end any differently here. He'll do what to him comes naturally and it won't be enough to make it to the next level. Players who succeed irrespective of talent are the ones who embrace a challenge. I don't see any evidence of Mallett succeeding to date because he improved his game or skillset. So far all I see is a guy who keeps getting chances to perceived to be by virtue of improving his odds...
Well, technically not the end result because the Vikings also got a 2012 7th round pick in that trade.
But for all intents and purposes the Pats traded Randy Moss for Ryan Mallett.
Good, bad or meh?
Let me get this right just so I can take in the general feeling. If someone goes to a big school with NFL calibre potential, does that mean they've taken the path of least resistance because there's more chance of having success and reaching your goal than at a smaller institution?Mallett chose Michigan first because it presented the path of least resistance to an NFL career. The opposite reason to Brady making that choice, a shot to compete against and prove he could hang with the best. Tom fought through resistance and adversity at every level and emerged as a HOF NFL QB as a result. At the first sign of adversity in Michigan, Mallett bailed to another path of least resistance. But just for good measure he managed to screw up on arrival at both locations. His rocket arm and competitive coaching being what it is in the NCAA, he lived to play another day. He won't get anywhere near that kind of leeway here. He will be pushed and prodded and berated for his myriad shortcomings mercilessly and unless he's suddenly done a 180 character wise it won't end any differently here. He'll do what to him comes naturally and it won't be enough to make it to the next level. Players who succeed irrespective of talent are the ones who embrace a challenge. I don't see any evidence of Mallett succeeding to date because he improved his game or skillset. So far all I see is a guy who keeps getting chances to perceived to be by virtue of improving his odds...
22 year old QB with upside at CONTROLLED salary for the next 4 years for 34 year old WR who is declining and wanted a fat NEW contract who is about to enter free agency. Character concerns with both. I'd say that's a GOOD trade... for the Pats! ^_^ Vikings would probably want a do over.
Mallett chose Michigan first because it presented the path of least resistance to an NFL career. The opposite reason to Brady making that choice, a shot to compete against and prove he could hang with the best. Tom fought through resistance and adversity at every level and emerged as a HOF NFL QB as a result. At the first sign of adversity in Michigan, Mallett bailed to another path of least resistance. But just for good measure he managed to screw up on arrival at both locations. His rocket arm and competitive coaching being what it is in the NCAA, he lived to play another day. He won't get anywhere near that kind of leeway here. He will be pushed and prodded and berated for his myriad shortcomings mercilessly and unless he's suddenly done a 180 character wise it won't end any differently here. He'll do what to him comes naturally and it won't be enough to make it to the next level. Players who succeed irrespective of talent are the ones who embrace a challenge. I don't see any evidence of Mallett succeeding to date because he improved his game or skillset. So far all I see is a guy who keeps getting chances to perceived to be by virtue of improving his odds...
At the first sign of adversity in Michigan, Mallett bailed to another path of least resistance.
unless he's suddenly done a 180 character wise it won't end any differently here.
We are doing something the other teams can't, that is trying to turn a J. Russell into a real QB
There are plenty of character questions, and I don't disagree with a lot of what you've written here. In many ways, he's gone the exact opposite path of Tom Brady.
But I don't hold the transfer out of Michigan against him. In all fairness, there's no way a slow pocket passer would have any hope in Rich Rodriguez's offense. He'd have a better chance playing DL as he would QB in that system.