Sorry you missed the Indy game...
Highlight: Danny Amendola 53-yard reception
Amendola averaged 25.7 per (3/77) catch in that game.
Edelman also contributed mightily in that game as the underneath guy moving the chains (6/84). Remember, Brady only completed 13 passes in the whole game.
I don't know what happened in the last game, honestly. The two Denver games were both awful for DA, which makes me believe that the game-planning was away from him...but I don't know.
Schemes matter, game-to-game. Decker got shut down in the SB, but he'll be the top FA WR this year by a wide margin.
Snap counts/yards/target %/receptions/rating
Edelman: 146 / 1,165 / 12.5% | 105 | 103.0
Amendola: 82 / 662 / 12.4% | 54 | 97.3
Dobson: 71 / 578 / 12.3% | 37 | 83.0
Thompkins: 69 / 627 / 11% | 32 | 88.2
Pro-rating Amendola snap counts:
146/82=1.78. 1.78x662=1178 yards
146/82=1.78. 1.78x54=96 receptions
I find it very reasonable to assume that if the injuries to DA had fallen to JE, with DA being healthy, their snap counts would have pretty much reversed - they're both tough-as-nails, even though they're both injury-prone. JE would have fought through the injuries DA got, as DA did.
It's just numbers.
A side note, and one that I'm sure would never be lost on a coach like BB: Amendola ALSO was the only NE receiver to post a positive BLOCKING rating with a +1.1 (Edelman was the worst on the team at -3.2). These are the invisible stats to fans, but not to coaches.
This hints to me (though I haven't the time or energy to check) that it's likely Amendola gets more snaps (%-wise) on running plays than does JE. Would make sense anyway.
Here: note 10 and 11 in the league...
Advanced NFL Stats - Player Statistics by Position WPA, by the way, is
Win Probability Added...this is Billy Ball for the NFL.
And yeah, he missed 24 games, including 15 in one season when he returned too quickly from an injury. Other than that year, Amendola has actually played more games than JE.
I see both of these guys as #2 WR and would be happy to have either (and happier to have both) on my team if I was an OC.
Of course, I've posted all this before, and so you'll just ignore it again (and make up some other fantasy of me loving Lavalle Hawkins or something). So I'll agree to disagree with your assessment.
Oh, and PS:
If a player dresses for a game I expect him to perform, otherwise I expect that he is inactive and we put a player on the field that can perform. I do not believe that if Amendola were as limited as you and others claim Belichick would have played him, he would have signed a UFA or promoted a PS player who was capable of filling the void, just as he has always done.
Two things: per snap played, Amendola was AS EFFECTIVE as JE. So per snap played, he performed, unless you want to say that JE didn't perform.
Second: Kyle Arrington says hi.