I would expect this type of nonsense from the Max Kellerman-type but not from a Pats fan.
The insinuation that Belichick can win with any QB is the biggest myth perpetuated by Brady haters but it doesn't stand to an ounce of scrutiny.
He's 41-57 without Brady, 207-60 with Brady, 237-70 including the playoffs.
In the 7 seasons he coached without Brady, he made the playoffs once, including two years in New England. He had 5 losing seasons in those 7 years. Biggest win total was 11.
In 17 seasons with Brady, he's missed the playoffs once, he's never had a losing season and he made 9 SB's. He's had less than 11 wins in only 3 out of those 17 seasons.
''Yes but Belichick took Matt Cassell to 11 wins he can win with anyone''
This is another ''argument'' that gets around that's just as dumb.
The difference between the 2007 and the 2008 Pats, i.e with and without Brady, was that one of those teams became the highest scoring offense in history (still #2 after all these years) the first and only team to win 16 games, and came an inch away from 19-0. The other team missed the playoffs and got smashed by every AFC contender.
So the difference between having the GOAT QB is a GOAT team and having a mediocre QB is a mediocre team. Who would have ever thought? Did anyone expect the Pats to be 2-14 because he doesn't play? You still need a decent team even if you have Brady. But a decent team + Brady is an automatic AFCCG appearance.
''Brady didn't have a great SB and they still won! Anyone could have won it with that defense''
That defense being the same that allowed 31 second half points against the Chiefs and required Brady to have three straight would-be-game-winning drives to win it.
This post isn't meant to be Brady>>Belichick. Both have been equally important for this remarkable run. But Belichick made Brady or Brady iS a SyStEm QB is something i'm not going to stand for.